Hacker News Reader

Comment by Palmik | Hacker News Reader

According to Clement (the HF CEO) they are close to covering their costs, and have 10years runway: https://twitter.com/ClementDelangue/status/16947653579682861...

View on HN

Can someone who knows the VC industry explain why having 10 years runway would be considered good? Aren't these companies supposed to be deploying capital as quickly as possible, not banking it. If a ceo said they needed your money 5+ years from now, wouldn't you wait until then to commit?

> If a ceo said they needed your money 5+ years from now, wouldn't you wait until then to commit?

Why would a CEO give up equity if they don't need the capital? Wouldn't they prefer not to sell big chunks of flesh?

If he's not deploying it now, maybe the CEO is predicting rough times ahead and wants to de-risk for future cash flow or fundraising turbulence? Isn't that, too, a kind of negative signal? Or is this all prudent?

There are times when capital is cheap and abundant and there are times capital is scarce and hard to come by

FOMO is a thing among VCs. You may not be let in the round 5 years from now, or the price may be less favorable, etc.

Someone who knows the VC industry should chime in on this - but AFAIK, companies don't get all their money from investor at once.

No, you typically get all the money wired into your bank account immediately after the deal closes.

It's possible to structure a deal where the company has to reach a series of milestones to unlock each additional tranche of funding, but this is less common.

Currently 10 years of runway. I wouldn't expect them to maintain that for a significant period of time.

Notice the choice of words: "Most of our OSS and free usage cost". Who knows what's omitted from that. Also assuming they have zero money left in the bank from the prev round (they def didn't) they're losing/burning $2mm a month

Reply on news.ycombinator.com