Sounds fishy. Probably their logic is that the current law adds anti-competitive barriers to entry that counterbalance any burdens to them.
In which way is that law useless for consumers then? Because, quite frankly, the last couple of years has made me quite jaded with regards to companies supporting right to repair.
If Apple supports this law, it must have been completely neutered.
At the time I’m writing this 100% of the current comments are something along the lines of “thing bad if Apple approves”.
No time for reading the article, or other research, just straight into the comments with their anti-Apple bias.
It's not a bias anymore after witnessing years of evidence on their anti repair policies.