If you computed the results of this problem, the next question I ask is whom are you at more risk from?
If you computed the results of this problem, the next question I ask is whom are you at more risk from?
No. It's not a measurement problem or a propaganda issue. It's just the truth. USG just literally doesn't 'disappear' US residents in modern times. It happens with nontrivial frequency in China.
For reference:
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/overseas-chinese-1021...
https://www.propublica.org/article/even-on-us-campuses-china...
https://www.thecollegefix.com/ccp-targeted-chinese-students-...
Moreover any such Chinese agents if caught will go through some rather unpleasant processes, does not seem usually the case for American cops even brazenly caught in various misdeeds.
I’m not talking about while I’m in America. I travel outside of the country.
If the CCP can make billionaires disappear, they can make you disappear too.
This level of narrative and dogmatic belief is how governments gain influence. They're simply the local bullies. If you need proof, look at how much they put into caring about struggling people. I.e. next to nothing. Our country betrays us daily and has the gall to demand obedience. We are not dogs.
> Two Arrested for Operating Illegal Overseas Police Station of the Chinese Government
Edit: example stats for 2016 sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_St...
In 2016, there were an estimated 1.2 million violent crimes committed in the United States.[88] Over the course of that year, U.S. law enforcement agencies made approximately 10.7 million arrests, excluding arrests for traffic violations.[88] In that year, approximately 2.3 million people were incarcerated in jail or prison.[89]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-...
The article is from 2015, but nothing's been done to reverse the trend. I wonder what they've gotten the ratio up to in the last eight years.
That's redundant and repetitive.
When you point your finger at someone, you have 4 pointing back at yourself.
This is the problem with the original comment, it’s way to vague, or I’ve failed to make sense of it.