Innovate on a cure for childhood cancers, for example.
Don’t pretend that we have all we need.
The article talks about scale economies, "a shrinking economy would achieve fewer scale economies", of which "a cure for childhood cancers" surely is not a representative example.
Don't pretend you understand what my comment meant, so you can abuse me.
A bigger economy will allow us to invest more time and resources into research.
Is this the 5-minute argument, or did you pay for the full half-hour?