Hacker News Reader

Comment by laputan_machine | Hacker News Reader

The addition of China data would make the legend useless, but it still goes to show out sized some things are, while the UK continues to chase Net Zero at the expense of its citizen's wealth, other countries (India, China, the US) prioritise their economy.

Heading towards a clean energy future is great, but it's costing our poorer citizens unequally more than our wealthier ones. See: ULEZ.

View on HN

I'm always at a loss with this argument. How does chasing cheaper sources of energy that also happen to be renewable hurt the poor? Gas generators cost the most per kWh to run. Our electricity prices rocketted because of natural gas prices rocketing.

If we'd managed to get off gas sooner we'd have clean cheap power, and energy independence.

It's clearly not cheaper, is it! Energy prices are higher than they have ever been! What are yuo talking about? Do you know anyone that lives in poverty? I do, I help them financially. These people are struggling, and NetZero is not helpful.

Wind is not cheap. We can do better than this

Edit: Seriously, I'm willing to be convinced but I am at a loss whenever I see people deny that increased inflation hurts people with less money than it does people like you. If you need me to explain how it works (that as a % of your income, poorer people will pay FAR MORE in energy, housing, food, and other inflation-related costs, which, you know, is in part fueled by chasing NetZero) I'll happily sacrifice my time to help you understand.

Poorer people in the ULEZ area don’t own cars, they live in flats overlooking car ridden streets. Besides ULEZ is not about stopping Co2 emissions or net zero, it’s about removing dirty smoke from the roads poor people (the ones you see on the bus) live on.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com