My comment was not meant to be snarky. I actually got the (incorrect) impression from reading your comment that P = NP would imply a polynomial time algorithm that decides SAT. I decided to look up a more authentic source and shared the best resource that I could find.

I am guessing you took offense at the "an actual complexity theorist" part of my comment, but it wasn't a personal remark against you. The general audience of hackernews is programmers and startup enthusiasts.

>I'm more than qualified enough to understand and present well-known complexity results from half a century ago, even when a misguided appeal to authority is at play.

All the more reason you should not be so insecure and automatically assume the worst about other people's intentions. *

* This time the snark is intentional.