... Being able to talk to someone without an intermediary is a problem?
> That doesn’t mean governments don’t have the right to regulate content on networks in their boarders: they absolutely do so long as they follow principles of Rule of Law.
Pretty sure governments have the right to do whatever they want regardless. It's that pesky "sovereignty" thing.
> But blocking on an IP can never be transparent
What do you mean by this?
And the funny thing is that their blog post complains of the following:
> In a deeply troubling response, after both terminations we saw a dramatic increase in authoritarian regimes attempting to have us terminate security services for human rights organizations — often citing the language from our own justification back to us.
Well, yeah. That’s what happens. It’s just a lot easier to justify something you wanted to do already, isn’t it?