Why Child-Care Prices Are Rising at Nearly Twice the Overall Inflation Rate
wsj.com
wsj.com
Not so long ago, it was customary among the idle rich to hire nannies, and even wet nurses, to raise their children, no matter how idle the rich parents were. Arguably, this was pretty good for employment, because of the small nanny:child ratio.
I've assumed these costs are substantially driven by safety regulations-- ratios of children to care givers, facility requirements, training/screening requirements, etc. To the extent that's true, it can explain why hiring someone to watch your child in your home could work out financially.
I think it raises questions about what the ideal level of safety is-- no one wants any children to come to harm, but if we turn the knob so far towards safe that becomes so costly to have children that people choose to not have then we've done the greatest harm possible to all the children that never get to exist at all.