If Twitter were to be the digital manifestation of a town square this would arguably bring it one step closer. Public spaces can be cruel and inhospitable places, they were never meant to be your personal safe space.
If Twitter were to be the digital manifestation of a town square this would arguably bring it one step closer. Public spaces can be cruel and inhospitable places, they were never meant to be your personal safe space.
And if you can only mute, you will not see it all but instead be a vessel to spread abuse to all your followers.
The town square analogy sucks. No one would accept a hate group going into their circle to shout slurs. Free speech absolutists don't care about other's freedom to live peacefully, only their own "right" to harass people.
I don't think this is true at all. People who get the most hate are not minorities but non-minority celebrities with controversial takes like J.K. Rowling.
Female only spaces would include all females. Not whomever Rowling decides has sufficient quantities of the essence of what she defines as woman.
I wonder if you did not know about that, or if you think that that person should share dressing room and showers with biological women.
If you didn't know about that, maybe now it's simpler for you to at least a bit see how JKR is thinking?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/28/trans-woman-...
(Just to avoid misunderstandings: Such events are of course very rare, the trans people I know are kind and lovely people)
https://fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-male-criminality-se...
More research is needed, but I think it's not an unexpected conclusion. I mean, the only difference between these men and other men is that they're calling themselves women. Most of them keep their genitals intact, and most are driven to identify as women due to a paraphilia.