I think he didn't mean that it's never used, just that it's never actually said in the real world.
My experience confirms this.
My experience confirms this.
EDIT: Can't reply to Tommabeeng's comment (probably too deep). Yup, and I agree with the presenter's main point - that classes are not necessary in many situations, even for decoupling.
That's wrong. I like the key to his talk but the plague of large complicated systems is exactly coupling and incoherence. Classes are NOT necessarily the way to achieve these.
I think his intention was to explain that these are the same words (mostly from academia and taken up with reckless abandon via language architectures like Java) that may be thrown around by some to create the code mess (anti-pythonic) in the first place.