At the time, I was on Comcast. 65/15 Mbps for $130/mo. I had this service for 10+ years and I was unable to upgrade to faster speeds without paying more.
I was one of the first people in my area to switch. Once I did, I got a call from Comcast saying they'd lower my bill to $50/mo. I saw their (and AT&T) trucks in my area and got ads in my mailbox for $40/mo 1Gbps connections.
The problem is, most places in the US do not have competition and Comcast and AT&T will not lift a finger to provide better service.
Hah! Haven't thought of that one in years. (You're dating yourself, BTW.)
For young whippersnappers, this is from https://vimeo.com/355556831 — a Lily Tomlin bit on SNL in the 70s, reprising one of her famous recurring characters from Laugh-In in the late 60s.
I had to use Comcast for years, they lied to me many times and I finally escaped to a place with a different provider. Suddenly, this year Comcast comes and buries fiber lines in my area.
I will deliberately avoid Comcast, competition is absolutely required to keep prices down.
I don't get how such a company can tolerate bald face liars working for them in so many segments of their staff, it's mind boggling and makes me think there are scumbags at the top who encourage this stuff or knowingly look the other way.
(I'm asking this as a non-American who is more used to governments passing consumer protection laws)
Spectrum's profits aren't even that high, so why would AT&T want to compete with them chasing down pennies, even 5 blocks away from HQ?
I'm not really sure what your asking me, do you want my opinion on whether they're making it up?
When Fiber disruptors like frontier, Google, or local metropolitans enter the picture: suddenly the ISPs have a lucrative deals because they finally have to freaking compete. Suddenly the data caps are non issue and consumers can get blazing fast speeds with no infrastructure changes because they are holding out.
Regulators need to prevent this in the USA, but have been captured by the isp lobbies. Cable crooks is what I call them, because that's all ISPs are now, crooks. They'll have techs steal or break your equipment. They'll hide evidence when damage was caused by their techs. They'll lie when outages occur due to their own infrastructure failures despite sending out contractors to repair. They'll say whatever they need to, no matter how fraudulent, to tack fees and monthly charges to your account. They've weaseled their way out of being classified as utilities despite that being exactly what they are.
I loathe the ISPs in USA. Of course they will push bills like this. I see no end to the hell of having them the as tollmen of the internet.
Take a look at regulated monopolies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government-granted_monopoly
The issue is ... they are granted exclusive rights by the local government.
If ISPs have backroom deals that amounts to collusion in the market, that is a conspiracy.
While I'm here, I have an anecdote.
I just moved from an old house to a new apartment a mile away. The house had gigabit from ATT and another ISP for 60/mo.
The apartment only offers spectrum and ATT. ATT top plan is 45 Mbps symmetrical, and spectrum has Gbe down/35Mbps up, each for $90.
I'm all for municipal internet.