Please stay classy and stop copying BirchBox
labaraka.tumblr.com
labaraka.tumblr.com
Unsuccessful copies may demonstrate that the barrier to entry is high (for whatever reason), and may in doing so still improve the efficiency of the market. Likewise, a failed clone may simply demonstrate the copying entity's inability to compete.
Regardless, I don't see how attempts to copy (and improve?) are a bad thing for the market.
BirchBox gets all of their samples for free. Beauty companies are used to giving out free samples and consider it a marketing expense.
BirchBox launched in May 2010 (source: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-08/strategy/3037... in which it's already described as a "NetFlix [clone] for beauty", NetFlix having started in 1999).
startupschwag.com started operating in mid-2007, sending startup t-shirts by subscription.
http://testtube.newbeauty.com/ appears to have been running since early 2007 in the exact same market that BirchBox is in.
Wine of the Month Club (.com) pre-dates the Internet, sending wine by subscription since 1972.
Why would you consider applying an existing business model to a new market to be cloning or copying; especially when there's no market overlap? Applying a successful model from one industry to enhance another seems to be the very definition of innovation.