Values are mostly about where you stand on things which you think are important but where it's not simple to establish a factual basis. This is (for example) why we don't have religious sectarianism about whether (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) forall a,b,c in C, but we sure as heck do about a bunch of stuff which you can't establish factually one way or another.
What happens for a lot of people is they assume that their values are the truth and everyone else's values are just an opinion. Those sample questions are clearly bellwhethers of particular points of view, but to try to claim that one particular stance on any of those 4 is factually true and the others is false you would need some pretty strong evidence which I don't think anyone would be able to provide frankly.
The best I can do is apply the categorical imperative influenced by my cultural context, upbringing and personal experiences.
Then the combinatorial explosions of ought conditions to step your simulation forward means you'll need Grahams number of time/entropy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF98ii6r_gU
"You Can't Get Snakes from Chicken Eggs"