There should be a term for social science clickbait, which is a lot of what these social science 'studies' seem to turn into.
> In time, the term has come to be identified as any deliberate distortion of scientific facts or theories for purposes that are deemed politically or socially desirable.
Is the rancher emitting or the hamburger consumer. Is the plane passenger emitting, or a shareholder. Ect
> cattle ranchers
The fact that you think these two things go together really highlights how blinded by ideology you are.
apologies if you are joking too