But how biased is the organization behind this study?
And why does it matter, considering its output is censored Disney style to not offend any pressure group anyway?
And why does it matter, considering its output is censored Disney style to not offend any pressure group anyway?
ChatGPT was trained on, essentially, everything on the Internet... if ChatGPT has a "bias", then, no, it doesn't: humanity does.
Or in the accidental choice of source material no?
You're relying on a particularly unhelpful and narrow definition of "bias". There are tons of valid and widely-accepted uses of the word to apply ot unintentional bias and to apply to things incapable of having intentions.
They did do it on the purpose—the RLHF. The RLHF process was definitely biased, deliberately or unconsciously, in favour of certain political, social and philosophical positions (apparently the same ones held by many in Silicon valley/OpenAI teams responsible for this).
An expression which is only said by those with a liberal bias.
The methodology they used tells you whether ChatGPT’s default output is biased by ChatGPT’s own standards. I think it’s a pretty neat idea.
DeSantis Has ‘Moved On’ But Disney Just Sued for New Damages. The company alleges that the Florida governor retaliated to its "Don't Say Gay" bill dissent by establishing an administrative board that would nullify contacts:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/disney-c...
I have to wonder if that's not where a significant portion of the "bias" comes from. ChatGPT isn't going to say that vaccines don't work. It's not going to bash trans folk. It's not going to call teachers groomers or indoctrinating kids. It's not going to rant about drag shows. It's not going to deny global warming. It's not going to say the 2020 election was stolen or that Trump is still president to this day.