Worst case, that's just 16 cars, twice a day. That doesn't seem like a thing to make a big stink about.

There are plenty of annoyances that come with living near other people. Putting up with a reasonable level of annoyance is an important part of having a civil society. I put up with my neighbor's bullshit and they put up with mine.

It really doesn't take that much time. On most roads you'd be hard pressed to notice 16 cars. What kind of road are they on where this would be material?

And one reason people choose daycares is because they are close. Where I live anyway many of us walk our kids to daycare.

My guess is they either don't like the woman or the idea of daycare. The car excuse is extremely flimsy.

There's between 500 and a thousand homes within a short ten minute, quarter mile walk of this daycare. There should be no traffic impacts whatsoever from this business, because nobody should be driving to drop off their kid at daycare. If their neighborhood is suffering from car traffic, then that's due to poor street design not supporting alternatives, not any single business attracting customers.

Nobody likes cars driving through their neighborhood. If these were good faith concerns, then these folks would be agitating for traffic calming measures instead of trying to quash the exact kind of business that belongs in a "residential area."

So once again cars are the problem. Get rid of cars and suddenly so many things are possible.

As a German, this deeply inculcated car-centric view presented by Americans, Canadians and Australians shocks me every time.