Federal Judge Upholds Arizonans’ Right to Record the Police
eff.org
eff.org
Recording cops can help trigger some public outrage but so often the follow up to bad interactions is 1 week unpaid vacation or getting hired the next district over and a $1 million dollar bill for the local municipality.
Until cops see personal impacts for violating civil rights, they aren't going to change.
Lots of discussion on this weeks back:
(I'm pretty skeptical of the law, but I don't think my view is fully informed.)
"Cops have it hard enough as is and if people are recording them they might hesitate in shooting a rapist which could get a child murdered!" That sort of thing.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2022/03/24/hb-...
It's a meandering argument to me as it makes a big deal about cops not knowing the intent of someone within 8 feet of the officer. If that's an issue I suppose anyone within 8 feet could possibly be a threat, but some magic 8 foot bubble would seem to be unrealistic to maintain anyway.
I will say that as a rando individual (not a cop) I get how I wouldn't want to be recorded as videos can be skewed and so on. But as far as police goes that's something that is just part of life and they should also be making their own recordings to counter some of that.
Side note: We've had several cases of various claims against cops in my area that were very quickly cleared up after there was a video captured by the cops. Without the video it would have been just he said he said type situation, but video cleared the cops (or at least showed the situation was far more complex) fairly quickly. There have been several "this is just like george floyd" situations where the rhetoric and outrage vanished fairly quickly after the video was released. They should be embracing that technology.
"I arrested you because you were recording me and didn't stop when I approached you to arrest you for recording me too close."
The lawmakers are focusing on the wrong problem.