According to this calculator you get a 446km diameter crater if you input:
- 15km asteroid diameter
- 90º Angle
- 80km/s
- Dense Rock asteroid
- Hitting on Water at level 10m
According to this calculator you get a 446km diameter crater if you input:
- 15km asteroid diameter
- 90º Angle
- 80km/s
- Dense Rock asteroid
- Hitting on Water at level 10m
So, for a quarter of a second or less it was touching the ground and almost double the height of Everest (8.8kms).
Would it do more damage to the surface than a rocky asteriod of comparable mass, though? If it burrows deeper, it means it transfers more of its energy to the mantle and core of the Earth, and less to the crust. It will be like a full metal jacket bullet that goes straight through the target and transfers most of its energy to the wall on the other side, versus a regular bullet that tumbles and expands as soon as it hits the target.
Neat sci-fi.
Sure, milliseconds before impact the atmosphere might be super-compressed (and super-heated). Perhaps even exert considerable force. But compared with kinetic energy of that size impactor, at such speed: negligable.
Small objects 'feel' the atmosphere much stronger. Surface area vs. volume.
It's strange that in managed to get only 2x of its diameter into the crust. I though it could just get though into magma. That would make the biggest volcano ever.
A column of air weighs ~1kg/cm^2 (handy!), and the example has a 15km span of "Dense Rock" which I've seen mean "Dense Rock Equivalent" in the Volcanic Explosivity Index, where it has a density of 2,500 kg/m^3. Assuming that, a column of the asteroid is
2500kg/cm^2/(100cm/m * 100cm/m) = .25kg/m * 15km = 3,750kg
The kinetic energy per column of the impactor is 1/2mv^2, or 0.5 * 3750 * 80000m/s^2, or
1875 * 6.4e9m^2/s^2 = 1.2e13 Joules
Which is about 20 gallons of gasoline equivalent. As you say, that's absorbed in ~1s (space is 100km up, so 80km/s is just about right). If so that warms up and starts melting the surface of the asteroid, but not much more I guess.
The whole impact is like 40000 gallons of gasoline per cm^2 of surface, or I think like 2kt TNT.
So then, not sure what the kinetics/kinematics is there. How much is released by the atmosphere impact vs then the surface stopping the asteroid.
https://chat.openai.com/share/25e4cef6-321a-43f7-8d13-40d1fd...
Summary: my initial math checks out for the total KE of the asteroid, and then we used that to look at the surface heating by the compressed atmosphere and then the Fourier heat analysis of conduction into the asteroid surface
Answer: Tho the atmosphere would be heated to 100k degrees and that's 1000x more than needed for vaporization of e.g. granite, the duration of ~1s means that only a few millimeters of surface would be vaporized by the time of impact.
I just did a compacted single-shot request in a new session and got the same answer!
It basically elided the simplifying analysis, went directly for the heat diffusion equation and based its conclusion on that. Impressive.
https://chat.openai.com/share/0c857ebd-779a-4f40-93a9-c35cd2...
So 30km down it would be hitting liquid rock and a lot of heat.
"Between 1995 and 2000, Tony Yeates suggested magnetic patterns beneath the Murray Basin in New South Wales likely represented a massive, buried impact structure. An analysis of the region’s updated geophysical data between 2015 and 2020 confirmed the existence of a 520km diameter structure with a seismically defined dome at its centre.
The Deniliquin structure has all the features that would be expected from a large-scale impact structure. For instance, magnetic readings of the area reveal a symmetrical rippling pattern in the crust around the structure’s core. This was likely produced during the impact as extremely high temperatures created intense magnetic forces."
But they would not able to verify that at that depth without a lot of drilling and the end of the article suggests that they have yet to do so.