[1] https://docs.house.gov/meetings/SY/SY00/20160202/104399/HHRG...
Misapplying models, in this case through the intentional omission of proper data for said model cause it didn’t exist at the time, is a commonly reoccurring theme from climate change deniers.
What this person did is tantamount to when PHDs carbon date an object known to be millions of years old, land on 6,000 years, then say “see earth is actually young.” Carbon dating doesn’t work on extremely old objects, so this is a misapplication of carbon dating with the intent to deceive and mislead.
In other words, it’s shit tier science created specifically to mislead.
A central graph in the 2016 address (found on page 2) has numerous visualization issues (e.g., misalignment of the lines on the graph to exaggerate differences, no uncertainty ranges are provided, averaging data sets in the curves, leaving out data) [2].
[1]: https://skepticalscience.com/skeptic_John_Christy.htm
[2]: https://skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm