Ask HN: Best tool to proof-read technical documentation?

Thank you, this is pretty much what I needed.

> ChatGPT used to work great for this, but I've noticed today that it misses simple spelling errors

I've noticed that with GPT 4; 3.5 still works pretty well. Or did the last time I used it for something like this (which was a few weeks ago).

Hmm so I was trying with 3.5 actually.

Hmm indeed. Well, in my defense, it's been a few weeks since I tried something like that using 3.5. Wonder what may have happened to cause the results to deteriorate.

A good human proofreader? :-) Though I do second the suggestion about Vale.

I'm going to proof-read them anyway, but it's so easy to miss stuff when you're reading and writing all these things yourself.

Who says the human proofreader needs to be the person who wrote whatever needs to be proofread? That's usually what you don't want to do, for the reason you mentioned.