Vietnamese EV maker worth more than Ford or GM after US listing
ft.com
ft.com
"VinFast closed at $37.06 in New York on Tuesday, well above the $10 price agreed upon when the carmaker merged with a special purpose acquisition company to secure a stock market listing. Its market capitalisation topped $85bn, at least $27bn higher than either Ford, General Motors or Fiat Chrysler owner Stellantis.
VinFast’s billionaire founder Pham Nhat Vuong owns about 99 per cent of its shares, leaving only a small amount available for trading. Only 1.3mn shares of the Spac were able to be traded after earlier redemptions and just $185mn in shares changed hands, according to analysts."
Pure market shenanigans.
This company does not deserve to be called publicly-traded..
If you and I IPO a company. We each keep 25% of the shares and float the remaining 50%. Using your logic, our insider shares representing 50% of the company has no value.
Also, if the company were to pay dividends, are our shares not applicable?
You can't calculate the value of a company on just the float, unless the float represents all or most of the shares.
Of course having such a small float is ridiculous as well. Seems like the vinfast stock is exists solely for financial shenanigans behind the scenes.
VinFast cars are some of the worst cars ever released in the U.S. Test drive one and you'll understand immediately. (And on that note, VinFast has sold fewer than 200 cars in the U.S. to date.)
"Basecamp is now a $100 billion dollar company, according to a group of investors who have agreed to purchase 0.000000001% of the company in exchange for $1."
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/basecamp-valuation-tops-100-b...
The media and everyone else should stop treating it as a number with any meaning.
It's a quick and easy calculation, and you shouldn't worry too much about it.
Pretty much anyone serious uses a market capitalization number calculated using the number of floating shares (shares actually available for trading by the general public), including all the (serious) index funds.
Everything will be fine :)
EDIT - For example S&P would assign this an IWF of 0.01, meaning it isn't even eligible for the S&P Total Market index fund, let alone the S&P 500:
https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/me...
https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/index-policies/m...
Shenanigans can flout that. Crypto trading is almost all shenanigans. So is most of the "pink sheets" (penny stocks). When the trading is thin, the metric is easily manipulated.
I wonder why he left - he probably had some golden handcuffs :).
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/16/ev-maker-vinfast-is-now-wort....