Twitter's response to US Government search warrant (turned over deleted DMs) [pdf]
dcd.uscourts.gov
dcd.uscourts.gov
I mean, yes, if we shave this with Hanlon's Razor, the outcome is the same, but the rightward swing of Elon's public statements certainly makes this look more like quid-pro-quo than an oopsie.
I'm about 1/10th of the way through the transcript and I haven't come to this conclusion yet.
* Hes posting a lot more
* The content of his posts are proportionately more "culture-war" topics versus company/nerd/geek stuff that he used to post
* Some of his posts align with populist conservative influencers
I don't have data to back this up - just my anecdotal experience.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/16/nato-official-...
That plan guarantees Russia can conquer the Ukraine rump state some time down the line.
The NATO staffer remark said “trade some land for nato membership for Ukraine”. Russia probably wouldn’t go for that one.
[1] https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/10/28/how-elon-musk-f...
I think that many of us believe that all personal messages should be E2EE. When user data is not encrypted, companies should fight tooth and nail before handing it over to the government.
(I'm not American and have a highly negative view of Trump, but that should be irrelevant.)
I believe that there will one day be a name for this syndrome, wherein a person who is the victim of prolonged internet trolling begins catering to the trolls with increasingly outlandish behavior, with their mind / beliefs warping into a shape that pleases the trolls.
Mechanically, I think a person who detects that they're a social pariah might lean into the social role of a jester: the tribe will keep him around for laughs, instead of fully ejecting him into the jungle to fend for himself.
I've been noticing odd behaviors in some public figures that make me believe instead of them 'preaching to the choir' - their 'choir' is convincing them a weird direction is a good idea.
I think this is exasperated by the bubbles of social media - I would love to be able to see what social media posts certain people have seen over the past 5 years or so - like individually, say if I could study every post that rob de niro actually saw in the past so many years.
I feel we need new terminology to describe the kind of warping of the mind and outward behavior changes these things can bring -
or is there some old descriptors I can't think of?
Historically, you could send a letter to a president. If the letter were unhinged, staff would throw it out. Thus, as a sociopath or a crazy, you'd have little or no access to a president.
Now, a president is bombarded by thousands of crazies per day, and he will actually read some portion of it. We're no longer ineffectually yelling at the TV: the man on the TV is listening. Anyone can easily gain a small part of a leader's attention, and collectively a group of crazies even without coordination can likely influence him.
Additionally, as a crazy prior to social media, you'd have to settle at best for periodicals from your extremist group of choice. Most of your life would be consuming mainstream information and interacting with normal people. This would balance you out a bit.
Now, you can consume extremist/conspiracy content all day long without ever coming close to running out, and your entire social group can be fellow crazies from around the world. You can create for yourself as pure an echo chamber as a cult in a commune.
It's a recipe for radicalization and induces the same strange-belief-conforming that can be seen in any and all religions.
This can play out at any scale. For instance, the majority of Republicans believe the election was stolen, liberal cities are overwhelmed by constant looting, and immigrants hoards are surging across the border. They truly live in an alternate universe, and it's driven by the information+social bubbles of social media.
I dub the phenomenon "bubbling". Whether the bubble is an internet troll funhouse or a fear-and-outrage feed or the welcoming arms of a coven of internet crazies, the bubble will shape most humans who enter one into the bubble's own image. You can and will be bubbled.
I'll add to your thoughts with the interesting battles even to the courts where some officials could not block a user, and be forced to listen to crazies they tried to filter out.
I would actually pay money to see the feed that deniro (and some others) has been bubbled with the past so many years.
There was a time when I saw distant fam getting a deluge of questionable memes and such that cobbled partial news with partial non truths and feigned outrage mobs grew into real outrage mobs that believed even if shown their sources were suspect, they cared more about the bubble than sorting whats right and wrong.
I assume this has happened to many people and very few have access to the bubble layers for each person, we may never know the influences others have been fed that has been guiding them.
Edit, more accurately: do not anthropomorphize lawyers.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/15/special-counsel-obt...
That conversation refers to:
> Among the data the search warrant commanded Twitter to produce: Accounts associated with @realdonaldtrump that the former president might have used in the same device.
They know that doesn't mean "anyone who @mentioned him publicly".
"Communications between Twitter and any person regarding the account including contacts with support services and records of actions taken"
That item means they have to hand over things like support tickets or emails sent to the @realDonaldTrump account or Trump's social media team.
The court specifically asked for other accounts used by trump on the same device. This SHOULD be as simple as control-F. Twitter almost certainly stores some sort of device identifier that can accomplish this.
They definitely do, and use this as part of when they ban a user permanently - all other accounts (i.e. "backup" accounts) that have ever used the device in question get banned as well. Happened way too often in my circles.
> To the extent that Twitter does not, it should be a simple process. You have cookies associated with an account; you have the email for the subscriber information; perhaps you have the phone number; you definitely have the IP addresses. Control F that through your system to see what other accounts have come from those IP addresses, are linked to that email address, are linked to the phone number, are linked to the same cookies. I don't profess to be a technological wizard, but it does not seem to be a complex issue.
Reminds me of freelancing nightmares where the client would being with: "This should only take a few hours but I need a website with a simple store front and shopping cart...". The best response I came up with to these clients was: if you know exactly how long it will take then you must know exactly the steps involved and how long each takes so you can do the work yourself and you don't need me :P
And from reading the transcript, it would seem that Twitter's objection is about analyzing the data, as opposed to simply providing it.
Bureaucracy is what slows down larger companies, but that's because incentives aren't aligned. When incentives are aligned and priority is understood, often that bureaucracy fades away to a large extent, even if for short periods.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.39...
Page 8:
> Nonetheless, the district court gave Twitter an opportunity to purge its contempt by producing the account information. When the court asked Twitter's counsel whether the company could produce the required materials by 5:00 p.m. that evening, counsel answered: "I believe we are prepared to do that. Yes, Your Honor."
I don’t think Twitter really would want the government to take physical custody of Twitter’s assets and do the search themselves, but, sure, they could have tried that response.
https://help.twitter.com/en/about-personalization-across-you...
> By better understanding how different browsers and devices are related, we can use information from one browser or device to help personalize the Twitter experience on another. For example, if you commonly use Twitter for Android around the same time and from the same network where you browse sports websites with embedded Tweets on a computer, we may infer that your Android device and laptop are related and later suggest sports-related Tweets and serve sports-related advertising on your Android device.
The judge and prosecutors were not fooled. Eventually the judge fined Twitter for all their nonsense.
So, contrary to some of the comments posted here already about dumb judges or whatever, this case shows a judge seeing through a bunch of techno-nonsense that lawyers tried to use to sow confusion.
HOLTZBLATT: I wanted to confirm that information because I don't want to make an incorrect representation to Your Honor.
THE COURT: Of course not. We have already been through that.Makes me want to strengthen my opsec big time.
There's also some confusion at the start because DOJ asked for other possible accounts that Trump might have used as a sockpuppet/backchannel means of communication and Twitter seems to either not be able to discover that, or can't find it.
They clearly CAN, but don't want to. Their (X's lawyers) objections in the transcript are ridiculous (they claimed they don't have an "affiliated account" category - like really?!?) and when pressed for timeframes suddenly they can produce "impossible" data in less than 24h.
If @realdonaldtrump and @johnbarron are both tweeting from the same IP in the same time frame, could Twitter make the connection that both are the same user? Was there enough backtracking stored in their systems to know that?
Not saying it's a viable technique but I get the idea that judges hate warrants that vague.
Legally, it seems asking for a company to run essentially joins across their DB tables is accepted practice. Otherwise, how could warrant be obtained from google for all devices within a specific geolocation? Requires at least a few DB queries I'd imagine.
I'm pretty sure this is record of what it took for the special counsel investigation to get access to the DMs of @realDonaldTrump.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/us/politics/trump-twitter...
They are pretending that a database search for an IP address, for example, in two different tables is a big challenge and requires them to "make" the data because they don't have all the matching IP addresses pre-queried.
Twitter is likely doing this because musk is now in charge, and wants to help the criminal conspiracy by hiding and denying the legally requested evidence
(Well, barring the QAnon folks.)
His opsec has traditionally leaned more towards the "how did they recognize me with this moustache on?" realm. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/donald-trump-alter-e...
Even worse, he used that password across several more services and didn't change them when his Twitter account was compromised. Legendarily bad, perhaps.
1. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/12/17/dutch-trump-...
Trump once claimed that he understood technology better than anyone.
And security.
And the proper way to milk a cow (probably).
Depending on the subject, he's the world's greatest expert, even if he can't spell the subject's name.