Ok, let's take the example of the video of someone being beheaded, who from the "local community" should do the moderation in that case? The ones doing the beheading, or the ones in danger of being beheaded?
Instead the way the social network is designed is that some freak who is a friend of a friend posts a video of a person's head being chopped off and a guy in Kenya has to delete it, because everything about the internet is profoundly insane.
Or are you suggesting that an optimal social network should jam both gay marriage and beheading videos down my throat?
I’m honestly curious what you’re getting at here. Would you mind making a much more substantive post?
edited: rewording
I recently explained to my child that there are things in this world we cannot forget and that is why we must be careful what we listen to, what we watch, and what we seek. The idea of stopping any of the above is impossible yet I can change where my attention is focused.