The EU wants to cure your teen’s smartphone addiction
politico.eu
politico.eu
I have five kids. The oldest two have friends that have various devices. But I don't care about their friends and don't cave. Believe me, it's really not that hard. Kids whine about all sorts of things, just add wanting a smart phone to that list. As an added bonus they get a lesson in not giving in to social pressure.
Parents parenting is the only way to solve this problem. And yes, some parents aren't going to do a good job parenting. It's the same with tobacco, drugs, alcohol, or any other dangerous behavior. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how people think regulation is going to do that job for them. No amount of regulation outside of an outright ban is going to make this go away. Sure, some guardrails can help, but at the end of the day people have to be taught how to avoid bad behavior on their own.
It works pretty well for alcohol and for tobacco. With regards to tobacco, there's been a clear trend towards less tobacco usage in teenagers since 1997. that's when awareness campaigns began.
I don't think that people think that "regulation is going to do [parenting] for them". I think most people that let their children use smartphones simply don't care too much or are not aware about the serious problems arising from excessive smartphone usage.
So imo those laws aren't intended to replace parenting. Its still up to parents to decide whether or not their minor children get access to alcohol and tobacco.
No, they won't stop parents from buying smartphones for their kids. But just as with seat belts or smoking indoors, they will frame giving one to a kid as harmful. This will give lawfully inclined people a reason to pay attention and - through the appliance of social pressure - nudge other people into compliance.
I have a much younger brother and I can watch him being mentally harmed from having access to a smartphone.
And even worse, the UIs are so simple, the kid doesn't even get computer skills out of it like we did.
I myself got some mental illness out of the deal but at least found gainful employment in the process.
There are situations where I'd think not giving a device to my kids wouldn't necesarily be all benefits
People that do get smartphones will develop ways of interacting, which you only "get" when you participate which you can't even know you're missing out, because you don't know what you don't know
A lot of it currently is "codified" in GenZ/Gen Alfa quirks, because they were the first to get smartphones so young, but it is there, and it can cause friction with older generations that feel it's all nonsensical
> No amount of regulation outside of an outright ban is going to make this go away.
How about regulation mandating voluntary parental controls mechanisms on social media platforms or devices?
Or how about regulation mandating that companies share certain aggregate usage data to get insight into the scope of the issue so that ultimately parents and society can be better informed of the damage being caused?
Or regulations about phones at school so that teachers and schools have effective tools (e.g. parentally consented confiscations).
Sure, these regulations may not make this go away but it's high time that we take a closer look at the consequences of social media and smartphone use that has exploded the last ~15 years. Not to mention this is the EU. I think you'd find broad support in the populace here for at least taking a stab at the issue.
I don't trust social media companies to self-regulate this kind of stuff at all.
https://support.google.com/families/answer/7106787?hl=en
This one's an anecdote I found when searching just now:
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/z4r77a/google_fami...
https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/COPPA-Childr...
Google stops locking in to behavior that is a direct response to age-related government regulations and defaults to the choice of the registered user at exactly the age the regulatiom ceases to apply?
Weird.
Some parents just don't realise how bad this is or they don't care.
Sometimes it's the grandparents who give them the smartphone and what you wanted to do is nullified and you are seen as bad because you deny to give them something "so good".
No, all in all, a global, robust solution need to be imposed by the governments. Like for tobacco, like for alcohol or drugs.
I have the problem with my daughter and I hate all this social media and stupid ad-based videogames in the smartphones.
This is when technology makes the world worst, the companies just seek their interest.
A direct comparison to toxins is hard indeed, but how about gambling? It obviously has enough addiction potential to induce certain people into compulsive and destructive behaviour warranting regulation. The same research that's been done in the gambling industry is being used in social media and especially mobile gaming today.
A global solution != a European solution/framework.
Seconded. These are just lazy parents. Let them get their kids addicted, I don't care.
The EU approach here seems more like "what do we do to fix the situation as it stands?" kind of thing. So, probably more practical.
That would be the ideal solution, however imagine being the only kid in the class who doesn't have a smartphone; that would be a bullying experience waiting to happen. Unfortunately finding the right balance between giving only what is right and not turning the kid into a misfit/loner is very hard.
Teens (and other age groups) are constantly bombarded with topics, issues, and information which they have to make sense of. Quite often, this information is pretty depressing, rage inducing, or emotionally manipulative in one way or another. They learn from this - instead of having a curated view of the world and information from their parents, elders, siblings, etc.
My nieces and nephews are constantly messaging each other. 95% of their usage is messaging. It is spread across several apps. Discord for gaming, IG for trends, TT for short videos, etc.
This is how they stay in touch with friends.
They aren’t obsessively doom scrolling, which I found quite interesting.
https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/a...
https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/teen-d...
I wish this was true. Even for me a grown up, professional, responsible person, I have a hard time not wasting time on the internet altogether on my phone. It takes a lot for me not to fall back into the habit of mindlessly readying news pages, subreddits, yes, HN, etc. I would have to uninstall the browser which at some point I might try but how would you even do that on an off the shelf Android?!
Point being, I used to think having to fall back to a browser is the solution to breaking the habit, but for many of us it's not.
I completely fixed it with LeechBlock on my PCs and AdGuard on my phone. Both pull blacklists from a big list of forbidden websites that I maintain on PasteBin. Here's my version for Adguard:
https://pastebin.com/raw/HRhewh9x
I let myself use LeechBlock's override for five minutes at a time, but if I find myself using it too much I start to feel dirty and I'll lock down the block set for a few days. Sort of a detox that I can invoke instantly and impulsively, and that might be the most important thing that keeps me on track.
I never turn off AdGuard on my phone because it also provides the ad blocking, without which I find the Internet completely unusable.
Smartphones and excessive screen time are damaging, for adults and even more so for children. I'm perfectly happy to deny the companies proliferating these unhealthy habits any chance to make profit. There should be no legal means to profit from other people's addition.
I do support regulation of production, trade and disposal of the products you mention, though.
2020s: Smartphone/Tablet
https://www.facebook.com/tvfansonline/photos/a.4324742602463...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
There are no credible efforts to introduce anything like a "social rating" in the EU.