Hacker News Reader

Comment by throwaway4027 | Hacker News Reader

I agree with you. As a developer I like the separation of style and content. We also gain better readability when the code says "<div class="product-price">199</div>" than a long list of tailwind classes.

CSS styles are also more reusable across different web sites. I can to some degree see that you can increase re-usability when using shared React components, but then you just create technical debt for those who want to test other frameworks

It seems to me that Tailwind is only a semi-scalable solution for those who use React components or similar. But as mentioned above, that causes problems when you want to make other webapps in another framework

View on HN

Can you explain something about why you prefer the separation of style and content? From my perspective all that it accomplished is making me modify two files (html template and CSS) instead of one.

There are several advantages of separating CSS and code from my point of view.

- I generally dislike inline CSS styles, and the benefits of Tailwind is not enough to overcome that.

- Reusability across systems. At least in mature businesses, they often have CMS systems, different frameworks etc. Using Tailwind kind of encourages everyone to use the same internal React component library.

- Easier to read PR and git logs. Adding a single tailwind class to a component may mark the entire line as changed, and you need to figure out what has changed (including checking the code, because you don't know if that also changed).

- Designers can make changes in CSS without having to learn React.

As soon as you have recurring product prices, you’re encouraged to use @apply to group those classes. In practice, however, you’re using components of some sort anyway, whether in Frontend or backend code, so this isn’t really an issue.

Where have you seen such an encouragement? Even Adam states that @apply was a mistake https://twitter.com/adamwathan/status/1559250403547652097?la....

It’s a completely viable solution for certain situations, say, having a .button class. The things mentioned in that twitter thread have nothing to do with that.

I was commenting on "As soon as you have recurring product prices, you’re encouraged to use @apply to group those classes. ". It's certainly technically possible to create a CSS class. But AFAIK the recommendation is loudly and clearly to use components https://tailwindcss.com/docs/reusing-styles#extracting-compo..., and for good reason.

I follow, but even that part of the docs acknowledges the use cases solved by @apply. No denying it’s a powerful gun to shoot your foot with, but it has its merits. Especially in the OPs context of some bespoke e-commerce CMS, which might not even have a frontend pipeline more sophisticated than grunt or something.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com