An ancient solar flare illuminated the start of the Viking Age
sciencenews.org
sciencenews.org
So if you find a tooth which dates from one kind of ring mark to date X, and a wooden artifact to date Y, and soil profile to date Z and they have distinct periods, you can start to tell a story about how they co-relate.
I like the ones which say "the bone marks say they were a metalworker (heavy use of hammer changing ligament anchor points)" combined with "the tooth enamel had to be laid down in puberty in the black sea" combined with "we found it in a layer in scandenavian bogs which we know date to this time" to say: Metalworkers were mobile from the black sea right up to the arctic circle, at this time.
I had no idea it was dated that precisely. I don’t suppose there is a June 8 “holiday” in any of the Scandinavian countries?
A.D. 793. This year came dreadful fore-warnings over the land of the
Northumbrians, terrifying the people most woefully: these were immense sheets
of light rushing through the air, and whirlwinds, and fiery, dragons flying
across the firmament. These tremendous tokens were soon followed by a great
famine: and not long after, on the sixth day before the ides of January in
the same year, the harrowing inroads of heathen men made lamentable havoc in
the church of God in Holy-island, by rapine and slaughter. Siga died on the
eighth day before the calends of March.
"sixth day before the ides of January" is assumed to be a scribal error because of other sources and because Vikings wouldn't raid in January. So, it's assumed to be June, "the ides" is the 13th, and the 6th day before it, presumably, would be the 8th.There is nothing to do with the flare itself influencing the Vikings somehow.
There are also Vendel age Scandinavian finds deeper in Courland along the rivers, such as seeming trade outposts and such.
Sure, maybe that doesn’t count as it’s primarily Gotlanders, and the lands in question were not Christian, but Scandinavians learned to sail around, trade, fight, and colonize long before Lindisfarne.
>>The solar flare in 775 and a slightly weaker one in 993 with a distinct carbon spike
How strong were these in relation to the Carrington Event? If these occur roughly every 1.5 millenia, how 'rough' is that repetition? We're at almost 1.25 millenia today, and our technology is massively vulnerable to a Carrington level event...