(2005), and according to [0] the university published a press release saying that the data was fabricated.

[0]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13835...

There is evidence that the data shown in the paper is fabricated: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.01.010

"The intermittent exposure showed a stronger effect in the comet assay than continuous exposure. Therefore we conclude that the induced DNA damage cannot be based on thermal effects."

Rapidly heating and cooling a metal is not the same as gently heating and cooling a metal

Title should be suffixed with (2005)