> solve this long run.
What “long run”
What “long run”
At this point, climate change denial is indistinguishable from rooting for a Mad Max existence. Even if someone is not convinced, they should still go along with changes to reduce emissions the way scientists propose because the price of being wrong is nature deciding to reduce emissions its way. And, as we are seeing, that involves a whole lot of destroying everything.
Technically we can. Those in power don’t _want_ to. They don’t have our best interest at heart.
These kind of “it is inevitable” attitudes are a big part of the problem.
The available data, as well as the interpretation of all credible climate scientists strongly begs to differ from your opinion.