It’s certainly an emotionally and ethically challenging subject, but at the same time there a Godwin’s law vibe about declaring things you disagree with “steps that lead to to dystopia”. That’s not a mindset that lends itself to compassion.
Canada has legalized medically assisted euthanasia, and we've already had cases of homeless people and chronically ill people seeking medical death due to hopelessness. We've had a government employee recommend assisted suicide to a military veteran who was just looking for a disability accommodation.
This is absolutely a case of "small steps that lead to dystopia", and we've witnessed these steps over the past few years. Economic and social conditions for specific demographics have become awful, and rather than trying to remedy those conditions, we're offering assisted suicide as an answer.
From: KVORK, Inc.//NYCNET.89.09.63.53
To: Multiple Recipients
Subject: SPAM: Tired of life?
Hello Friend,
Has life become too impersonal, too tedious, too painful for you?
Then now is the time to exert control, to make that decision which
is ultimately the only real choice we ever have: the decision to die.
Some may describe this as an act of selfishness, but with the dwindling
reserves of natural resources throughout the world you're actually
contributing to the well-being of all those around you. A recent bill
passed by the United States Congress even authorizes a one-time payment
of c10,000 to your chosen benefactor upon passing away.
So do yourself, your family, and your friends a favor and visit any one
of the KVORK, Inc. clinics in a neighborhood near you. We'll help you
make a difference -- quickly and quietly.
Sincerely,
Derek Schmitt
Director of Development, KVORK, Inc.My point was not complaining about Godwin’s law, or about slippery slopes. My point was almost the opposite: the tendency to trot out ultimate, extreme ends in every disagreement. Hitler for Godwin, dystopia for others.
It’s not a persuasive argument in either framing. “You’re destroying civilization” is the rhetoric of someone who, like the author of the linked piece, can’t actually articulate why someone’s actions are wrong. Seriously, the piece never gets there. It’s a lot of legitimate, honest hurt tied up with “dystopia” as if that makes the position unassailable.
So apologies for being unclear, hope that’s a more cogent representation of my distaste for this style of argument.