Top physicist: chatbots ‘glorified tape recorders’, predicts revolution ahead
fortune.com
fortune.com
He is less a physicist than a parrot that is paid to repeat far fetched claims about whatever pop science thing is in the news.
So they don't see the incoherence of the article because they never click, or else they don't have the historical context to see how it's bizarre to present Kaku as a voice against "media sensationalism".
Also I would not consider him an expert in anything ML, though he probably has enough of the underlying math to get some things.
See the link to Aaronsons blog elsewhere in the thread for an example of the kind of drivel Kaku puts out, and why he shouldn’t be taken seriously.
Compare the feeling of: "Top financial advisor Elon Musk warns against cults of personality, stresses importance of finance fundamentals."
I generally agree that his prediction about ML/AI should be considered less-than-informed.
It was just a glorified countdown-to-chat with human customer agent. It was fine for that, otherwise worthless.