- FTTH everywhere (even in remote areas) with provisions to ensure competition and eliminate ISP lock in (which happened in the cable days, lessons were learned)
- tracking IPv6 deployment, publishing detailed yearly reports of status and plans, and pressuring ISPs
- mandating IPv6 if a mobile operator wanted a 5G license
Net result is you can basically assume that IPv6 is there except in increasingly rare cases (90-99% except one laggard). IPv6 just works, and is a freaking breath of fresh air in a world of double NAT and CGNAT. I've been on IPv6 for over a decade with both simple and complex scenarios, and every bit of IPv6 is just flat out better than IPv4 in my experience.
I wrote a lengthy comment a month ago regarding the ARCEP IPv6 report: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36788130