Hacker News Reader

I'll point out that banning parties who would seek to destroy democracy is part of the German constitution. Article 21. There's no irony here. What is being mooted is something deliberately introduced in the immediate aftermath of the Nazis and World War II, to prevent a reoccurrence.

(I've slightly lost the thread here, so I'm not 100% certain you're disagreeing.)

View on HN

I wasn't aware of that, my notion of a good constitution is that you should be comfortable with your worst enemy wielding the powers it grants.

I'm curious what checks there are on Article 21 then. It seems like a no brainer that an unfriendly government count just declare all their opposition enemies of democracy. How is that power limited?

The irony is that banning political parties on the grounds of threatening the German state is exactly that the Nazis did after Hitler became chancellor with the Reichstag Fire Decree. And the same thing East Germany did to cement communist control.

"We have to disenfranchise you to protect democracy" is a self defeating idea.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com