I (for one) noticed. I also found a way to see the "dead" later.

I also noticed somebody posted that the content of the submission on Twitter was manipulated.

I am also noticing that you are not aware that the community tries to avoid flamebait material. Your submitted question is, by the way, another Bayesian needle swinging (i.e. the entailment is weak, other sides are blinking).

If the material were authentic, I would vouch "like there is not tomorrow". What will instead happen is, after having checked a few references to K.S., I will check further material soon and see if something more objective comes out.

...Have you verified that content you submitted? Was it supposed to raise questions about the WEF, or about the Twitterworld? Depending on veracity, it is either one or the other.