California to set up a $1B electric car network
venturebeat.com
venturebeat.com
If you weren't aware, the project better place system is like the cell-phone market in the US. You will buy a slightly discounted car but are only able to fill up at exorbitant rates from bp-owned equipment.
On the other hand, cars like the Volt (as if it will ever be built) or a PHEV Prius can be charged at home or any type of outlet. A completely free market with no monopolies. We can't afford to change from a dependence on one fuel to a dependence on a single company.
EDIT:
Well, shoot, maybe I should have read it all. They won't be operating the same as in Israel. Hence this line in the article: "That’s likely why it was clearly stated that the thousands of Better Place stations to be installed in northern California will be agnostic to the type of electric car"
but we should remain vigilant; Magnacharge lobbied the NEC committee to effectively only allow their over-priced, patented charger to comply. See: http://www.repp.org/discussion/ev/199712/msg01052.html
Who is to stop any other company to do the same, provide more competition and lower prices?
I would rather die of starvation before being forced to drive one of those electric slothboxes.
Then again, that's me, I doubt many of my fellow citizens have the same passion for automotive ecstasy.
Instead of specific victims and anonymous perpetrators, we have specific perpetrators and anonymous, scattered, uncertain victims. It hardly even makes sense for people to talk about victims of one's globally dispersed pollutants, even if it causes just as much damage.
1) I'm a car / driving enthusiast
2) Most American citizens aren't automotive enthusiasts like myself.
It's not merely automotive enthusiasts who do such things. Nearly everyone thinks they're a special case. That really worries me.
To get a sense of the scale of things, the north pole ice-cap has receded so much in the summer that the increase albedo is putting incredible train on the greenland icecaps. If they melt, hundreds of millions of people in low lying coastal regions, such as Bangladesh, will be displaced. It could be averted if people refrained from heating all of their massive homes in winter instead of wearing a sweater and driving in two tons of steel and glass to get to the shopping mall and riding in a Lamborgini or an SUV or a big F-500 truck because it feels good to them. Because it almost doesn't matter what happens to technology in the next few decades, unless our attitudes change, we will find ourselves in a major environmental mess.
...personally, I just hypermile when I'm forced to drive, and ride a 45mpg, 3 second 0-60 motorcycle other times. I trade off expected lifespan instead of externalized environmental effects for my automotive enjoyment.
http://wilshipley.com/blog/2008/09/tesla-v-supercharged-lotu...
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/11/17/tesla-roadst...
Seriously though, I would be very sad if internal combustion engine powered cars vanished. I personally suspect that the future of personal transportation is still gonna be based on liquid fuels (maybe cellulosic or even algae-derived ethanol) because they're so much easier to store and transport than anything else.
Hydrogen storage requires weird high-pressure containers and exotic materials. Electricity storage requires weird toxic metals placed in weird toxic solutions. Ethanol storage requires a bucket.
Alternately, you can harness sunlight directly, distribute it across the existing grid (fairly unobtrusively), temporarily store it in batteries or capacitors, and directly power an electric motor with it. Electric storage also benefits from the same economies of scale as laptops and cell phones.
My opinion, a humble one, is that biofuels are better suited for niche applications where electricity can't be used.
No one is going to take your car, but if they wanted to, you could probably keep it for 40 years or so, if manufacturing was switched to 100% electric car tomorrow :)
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/11/electric-motorcycles...
http://www.killacycle.com/2008/10/24/new-world-record-at-ban...
Evidently the state's not deeply enough in debt yet. With the higher taxes coming up to pay for all this, even more taxpayers and corporations (7,000 in the last few years) will leave, accelerating the financial death spiral.
I find this more interesting then blindly giving millions to charities.
Anyone got any good numbers on questions like: if half of California's cars were switched to electrical over the next ten years, how many more power stations would the state require?
He has a 2.5 page bibliography at the end, if you need more exact answers.
http://me222.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/twentyfirstcenturyc...