Forget 10k Steps. Here's How Much Science Says You Need to Walk
time.com
time.com
These studies constantly show that you should try to walk as much as you can throughout your busy day. The mortality decrease alone with every 500-1000 steps is quite the motivation.
It's hard to spend an hour and a half or longer to get to that original 10000 steps mark. We should however encourage movement. A little movement leads to more movement as you start to feel better.
What should not happen is to lower the bar of how many steps you "need" each day. Because that is what articles like this and popular health magazines will try to portray.
Possibly the most telling graph is Figure 3 (not link-able): a continuous curve degrading the "all-cause mortality" risk, steeper-before-flatter-after the (very roughly) 7000 steps, but with continuous gain (up to the scale end of 20000).
Time spent is probably more important than actual number of steps, in my opinion. A one-hour+ walk (in addition to your normal activity, divided up across the day), regardless of how fast you go, is more valuable than a walk that nets you 5,000+ steps. Not everyone can walk 5,000+ steps in a day, and not everyone should try to reach that.
> It turns that in 1965, a Japanese company called Yamasa Clock created a personal-fitness pedometer called the Manpo-kei, which means “10,000 steps meter.” The Japanese character for 10,000 looks almost like a person walking or running, which is likely how the gadget-maker landed on the name—and the number. It’s also an easy goal to remember, especially when accompanied by a sketch of a person who’s literally walking.
https://www.popsci.com/story/health/10000-steps-evidence-stu...