searching ddg for pawoo shows this is not news for anyone so i find it strange that you would even bother question why any other server would accept federate with it
and how the fuck isn't this comment deleted yet? dang?
searching ddg for pawoo shows this is not news for anyone so i find it strange that you would even bother question why any other server would accept federate with it
and how the fuck isn't this comment deleted yet? dang?
There's no CSAM in the /comment/, just a lament that masotodon.social and pawoo don't federate with each other. Want to take action against a service you find (extremely) distasteful? Great, take action -- dig through their DNS, figure out where their servers are hosted, talk to the FBI. But invoking /dang/ to do something about it (to...protect the emotionally fragile HN community from being exposed to the existing of something vile?) just isn't that action.
I for damn sure won't defend the folks running pawoo, but we ought to defend to the death omoikane's right to talk about it. Free speech runs both ways, and sometimes that sucks.
look, it's my fault for clicking on a blurred image, on a site i didn't know
i just did not expect that stuff on the first hop out of hn
when i wrote child sexual abuse media, i was not referring to a depiction of but rather a picture of an actual child being abused
this is not up for debate
edit: that you need to get a throwaway to argue you point tells me you know this shit is indefensible
Wrong, I just don’t wanna argue the morality of lolicon images using my real name.
A better way is to ignore the live feed (or suggested/recommended/featured/etc) and only follow the users you are interested in. I am not on pawoo.net, but it has a lot of artists that I would like to follow and couldn't follow them from mastodon.social.
i'm starting to question if you are arguing in good faith