The problem is that you’re just taking opportunistic stances.
>Big pharma is bad, and we should not be pushing drugs that were rushed through approvals
This is your position when talking about vaccines, despite the fact that vaccines actually work, and the “rushed” actually just means it skipped months of wait times.
>big pharma is good, and we should be needlessly pushing drugs that have not been through efficacy studies just cause
This is your stance on ivermectin
You’re taking two different stances on the same position depending on what your political hero said.
Then you’re posting lies, and when called out on the lies, post more lies.
You say that physicians were “being bullied”. But they weren’t. They were being told not to push unproven drugs. That’s not “being bullied”.
Physicians were rightfully “being censored” when stating unsubstantiated claimed of efficacy, as the studies don’t support them.
Even today, different studies on ivermectin alone produce different results. Yeah. There are studies showing a positive benefit mild cases. But there are also studies showing no difference, and more studies showing zero preventative benefit for becoming serious.
That is to say that even today, we don’t have conclusive evidence that ivermectin works. So doctors who declare that it does are lying, and absolutely should have those statement “cancelled”.