"Over-confident"
"solution"
This is just too much, it's satire right? Really good if it is. Nothing more fragile and angry than an "expert" who has their proclamations challenged, or an indoctrinated follower who is threatened with scary opinions.
The Roman legal system was extremely arbitrary and highly dysfunctional by modern standard. Why transporting some random feature of it (which contributed to it being such) to the modern world would ever be a good idea?
> revert that kind of power to its citizens.
It think it’s the inverse and would significantly decrease the “power” a random person has due to obvious reasons.
> fragile and angry
I’m neither angry or fragile. Why would you even use these words? I just shared my observation, that’s it.
> indoctrinated
That generally comments which include this word tend to be at least mildly deranged is another thing I noticed here as well.
However seeing personal insults everywhere and feeling the need to respond in kind seems rather tiresome.
> solutions
What's more tiresome is people spouting rambling and incoherent "critiques" of others which they are incapable of substantiating due to their dishonesty and/or other mental deficiencies.
Being so angry at random people on the internet is not good for you..
A weak, dishonest back-down after getting called out on being unable to substantiate your blathering. Pathetic.
But just to clarify a bit: I’m not “backing down” from anything I said.
Unfortunately it’s just hard tell what exactly I’m supposed to substantiate because your diatribes are a bit too incoherent.. and it’s quite hard to comprehend what are you trying to say.
I would advise you to tone do the amount of “personal” insults when trying to communicate with other people.
They really obscure your actual points (assuming they exist?) and they they aren’t doing much anyway since I still can’t really tell whether you’re talking to me or somebody else.
Also I generally find that insults are most effective when used sparingly or in a subtle backhanded manner.