Hacker News Reader

Comment by mirzap | Hacker News Reader

I remember trying Infiscal, and I was excited to see how good it is, the feature list in the OSS version, and its ease of use... What cooled me off is this limitation in OSS: "3 Infisical Projects, 3 Environments & 5 Team Members."

That's not nice. It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that. But limiting essential features - team members is a no-go.

View on HN

> It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that.

Personally, I can't wrap my head around people wanting to use Infiscal for better security while *not* using SSO.

This is very strange. There is no such limitation. You can create as many projects and environments as you need. You can also add an unlimited number of users

Second this, we don’t have any such limitations on OSS that is you can totally self-host Infisical on your own infrastructure and have unlimited users, projects, and environments.

I think there may be a mix-up here with Infisical Cloud which is the managed service with subscription tiers.

OK, that's great to hear. You may consider removing the "Usage & Billing" page from OSS when self-hosting. Because I thought I'd have to upgrade OSS with a business license once I reached the limit.

Yeah, we should probably do that. I get that it might be confusing

Check the pricing page: https://infisical.com/pricing

Yeah, I've noticed that the app is not enforcing that limit ATM, but the limit was clearly visible in the dashboard when I tried it a couple of months ago (OSS, docker)

That's only for the hosted service, no? They have a MIT licensed version

Yeah the pricing on their is only for the hosted service.

Yes, but you can see the Usage & Billing page even on OSS. So, it's a bit confusing seeing "Upgrade" CTAs there.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com