People who work from home spend their time ‘napping, doing DIY and having sex’
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
I actually like working in an office, but only if I'm co-located with my coworkers and I have my own, relatively-private space work in.
Removing the forced optics of "work" is one of the best part of WFH.
That makes it your problem instead of management's problem, it's basically telling staff they don't care about their social/personal wellbeing indirectly and they don't mind making problems for many people if it solves 1 of their own.
This would be reading between the lines on a job spec: "company has a great work from home ethic, but requires you to be in 3 days a week"
I wonder how much corporations paid to get this article planted so that CEOs can point to it as the reason they want RTO?
This does make my job harder. The reason for this is that a great deal of my work happens in 30-minute increments, making decisions, in meetings. But that is not how software gets built. Developers work in half-day increments. Flow matters, extended concentration matters (I was a software developer for over two decades). Making my job easier at the expense of my people would be utterly foolish. I think most software-oriented tech companies (or departments) will hold to this. The real challenge, as always, is to find people driven to work hard and who delight in solving problems.
I don't know how this dichotomy of time-boxing translates to other businesses that aren't about crafting software or extended periods of what is essentially thought-work. Restaurateurs must go to the restaurant, factory workers to the factory, but if your job is crafting text in digital form, you can be located anywhere.
Employment, depending on the job, should be about what the employer pays to get from the employee. And most of the time (ahem), it shouldn't be time that is traded. Naturally it takes time to accomplish things and fulfill your obligations, but the amount of time is rarely fixed. Instead, things like training, experience, skill set, tools, contextual information, and especially energy contribute to fulfillment.
Maybe a 40-hour/5-day workweek isn't the only way...
WFH won't go away, because children are being raised with FaceTime and Zoom as normalcy for them. Especially college students, most of their classes are "distance learning"; in fact, I found it difficult to register for in-person classes because most of them were going online only. This was in the before-times, but as late as 2018.
I had a professor say "don't try to do your laundry while you are working on a class assignment" and I chuckled, because I had done exactly that. It wasn't optimal for my attention, but my AFK times were less than 5 minutes.
My schedule is really flexible. They do measure my productivity in terms of the end results, and they look for me on Slack. But I can clock in/out whenever, throughout the week. And I do have problems with my sleep schedule. So if I feel drowsy then I will take a nap in the middle of the day, and if I wake up at 2am, then I clock in for 4 hours and I'm productive.
My employer receives my best efforts, and we trust each other, so I don't goof around while I'm on the clock, and I stay mindful of that time, because it belongs completely to them.
For example, an article title from this week - "How Gen Z is exploiting the talent war to grab pay rises – and propping up inflation"
Nonetheless, it used to be a quality journal, despite it's clear bias.
These days maybe not so much.