> But the discriminator of having to "pay an intelligent professional otherwise" sets the bar very high. That implies AGI
I believe they were using that discriminator to classify AI, not AGI.
I believe they were using that discriminator to classify AI, not AGI.
Exactly. "Ah but your system to organize the warehouse is not intelligent!" "No it isn't, but it does it intelligently - and without it you would have to pay an intelligent professional to get it done optimally".
AI: "automation of intelligence".
(Not "implementation of intelligence itself" - that is AGI.)