Hacker News Reader

What's the problem with that?

I don't know the exact limitations, but for a personal home lab that seems fine. For companies, I imagine they could either pay proper for RHEL, use free CentOS Stream or Fedora, or some other server distro like Ubuntu or SUSE. Why is there such a need for RHEL specifically?

View on HN

>Why is there such a need for RHEL specifically?

Just a guess, but I'd posit that revenues from RHEL support contracts pay the salaries of CentOS Stream and Fedora developers and maintainers.

I could be completely wrong, but given that the latter two feed the former, it would make sense.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com