Teams is so weird, “ Number of org-wide teams allowed in a tenant” is limited to 25.
So my company can only have 25 “general” teams.
I think it would be neat to learn the rationale behind some of these settings.
So my company can only have 25 “general” teams.
I think it would be neat to learn the rationale behind some of these settings.
Perhaps they should rethink the use of numbered superscripts for notes in that table....
If you are participating in 25 teams, it's likely already too many, general or not.
Having to navigate 25 teams that are full of stuff doesn't concern you sounds like an absolute nightmare.
You'd burn out everyone in the organization with a setup like this.
But I think it’s funny that someone said “20 is not enough but 30 is too many.” And then implemented it.
Setting such an arbitrary limit so low is what is interesting to me. Fight for an opinion of “none” or “one and only one.” But allowing the hellscape of 25 teams where people accidentally invite all employees to their meeting, but not allowing 100 teams is funny.