>You could pass it to an image recognition model and see record the degree to which it thinks it is...
We don't care what another algorithm "thinks". We want to see if what it draws is humanly interpretable as a unicorn.
We don't care what another algorithm "thinks". We want to see if what it draws is humanly interpretable as a unicorn.
I appreciate all the comments around determinism, sampling, scientific method, but as I said when I posted this just after building, it really is just for fun and to see, over time, if the general mish mash of outputs become more refined without any changes to the prompt (which doesn't aid it through CoT/ToT or improving on previous attempts etc.)