Lines of code that changed everything (2019)
slate.com
slate.com
> Date: 2002
> Established a new way for technology (and cats) to move in the physical world
> (define-behavior (bounce :start-when (or (bump?) bounce-trigger? ) :abort-when (bump-edge?) :onetime? t))
Does anyone closer to the source here know if Roomba is still written in Lisp?
I suspect that's why lisp is in there at all! It's very likely python/cpp nowadays though.
Quoting: “A year after the index began, it was sitting at 725 and it should have been at 960. As embarrassing as the whole affair has been for the VSE, things could have been worse. Had the exchange introduced options based on the rise and fall of the index – a feature of the Toronto Options Exchange planned for next January – the VSE would have had to adjust wins and losses of investors. As it was, the exchange only had to pay for three weeks of computer work and the fees of consultants brought in from Toronto and California to put the index back in order, Seasons said.
I wonder if the reason Stuxnet isn’t on there is because its impact is yet to be seen.
#define true 0
#define false 1
everything++ echo "everything" | sed s/every/no/ #define struct union // Saves memory
#define while if // Improves performanceHSTS is not that important in itself, but it represents the general transition to "all https". Before that, https existed, but it was only used in select cases, like for entering your credit card number, early browsers even had a warning when https was enabled. Nowadays, https is the expected default, browsers are starting the throw a fit when they see plain http, and many tech-savvy users will go "Seriously, http? We are in the 21th century you know". More generally, the need for encryption-by-default also represents how the web is tied to the real world now. People use it to deal with real money, sign contracts, and exchange secrets that have real life consequences if they fall into the wrong hands.
The author picked a bit of code to represent that, and he chose the HSTS header. Debatable, but I think it is a good choice.
"forking" netbsd established competition in the "free" BSD space by OpenBSD and FreeBSD. The FreeBSD system in particular was the basis for thousands of commercial products.