For me it’s also a red flag: Neither system seems to be designed to be approachable. One or two brand names are OK, but these systems seem to use them way too liberally.
They may not grasp every little thing, but they would be likely to get an understanding.
But the use of deliberately weird terms for things makes it less possible for those who likely have overlapping domain knowledge to understand these systems or posts about them.
But there's also probably some new and interesting criticisms one could make? Perhaps about the actual project described in the article? And maybe after having read it and understand it? That doesn't seem like too high a standard.
The fact is that’s a major red flag.
Also I’m not sure you get to claim boredom with the answer to a question you directly asked.
And that's not because I am beefing with him or have any personal beef with him. He's literally not there anymore. He went away, years ago.
this would be a true "personal server", and it will achieve much more than Urbit ever could.. except insane jargon at least...
Urbit is really an outlier, with jargon/innovation fraction far exceeding anything else I have seen.