Suicide of Richard Bilkszto
thefp.com
thefp.com
The "diversity" training described here sounds bizarre. I've yet to find any rational defense for it aside for the fact that the the people most vocally against it are supposed to be the cause of it on paper. Oddly, I'm steadily coming across instances where this training seems to target people who likely didn't hold problematic beliefs toward other races prior to this sort of DEI training. The whole practice reeks of sabotage from a more powerful establishment and lacks the polish possessed by Black Civil Rights activists of the past.
There is no rationality here, it bunks on vanity.
The women here doesn't hold qualifications because she is black. She doesn't have the facilities to teach anything in my opinion.
It isn't just unlikely he was a racist. He thought disadvantaged kids. The people accusing him are scammers. The vanity of accusing a poor black women, real racism, is a cover here.
If you zoom out a little, you should be able to see what this really is.
Article doesn’t belong here.
Don't lie about it.
Oof, after you said that, I did a little exploring and immediately found a plethora of anti-trans apologetics, most notably with The Witch Trials of JK Rowling, a podcast that defends JKR's naked transphobia as mere concerns, which Natalie Wynn has a great video about here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmT0i0xG6zg&t=1240. And then, just by scrolling through the home page, I found the articles: "How Therapists Became Social Justice Warriors", "When Ideology Corrupts Medicine-and How One Reporter Exposed it", and "My Research on Gender Dysphoria Was Censored. But I Won’t Be." Just... yikes.
Sooo, yeah, I have to agree that the website is suspect and may very well be jumping to conclusions because they have an agenda to push.
It's really a very good exploration of the issues with plenty of context. Phelps gives both Rowling and her detractors the space to put their point of view across.
If you haven't already, it's well worth listening to, much more so than Wynn's one-sided commentary on anything.
Claiming NW's commentary as "one-sided" while you're suckling at the teat of JR's Kool-aid shows your own bias and hypocrisy. Try sticking to the topic at hand, or facts at least.