I went to 50 different dentists: almost all gave a different diagnosis (1997)
rd.com
rd.com
I went into engineer mode and while I acknowledged I didn’t have domain expertise, I asked questions and probed the whole situation. Very unsatisfactory, meandering answers.
This was a deeply distressing experience. For the first time ever I did the “call in a personal favour” thing and asked my dad to reach out a family friend, a former cosmetic dentist and former head of the province’s dental association for a second opinion.
He saw my son a few hours later and he was just livid about the diagnosis. That it was possible they’d have to come out but it’s impossible to know this for at least a few more weeks or more.
In a few months the teeth returned 100% to normal and firmed right up as the ligaments healed.
I’m not a conspiracy nut. I believe in listening to experts (but ultimately making an informed decision). I believe in modern medicine. But that experience shook me and forever changed my trust in the dental industry.
My feeling is that the nature of dentistry leaves a lot of room for subjectivity and COVID left a lot of dental chairs empty.
If you are a dentist, "more dentistry" is likely to resonate with them as a solution, especially if that means they charge for doing the work. No different than if you ask a software developer if you should hire them to automate some process. A true pro may say "nah it's not worth it for you" but that's rare...
It's fashionable to dunk on folks who "do their own research" but I admire that more than those who are proud of unquestionably taking direction from vested parties.
The reality is that modern medicine is absolutely amazing, but there are also many interventions backed by shoddy science or no science at all. Sometimes, "doing your own research" exposes such lapses. Sometimes, it sends you off the deep end and you end up chasing ghosts. To allow the former, you need to tolerate some of the latter.
And yeah, sometimes the shoddy science involves interventions so basic and so common that you'd think they're sorted out. Consider that Europe and the US take wildly divergent views on topics such as wisdom teeth, colonoscopies, or the value of flu vaccines.
"Science literacy" doesn't shield you from being wrong. Maybe it helps, but there's no shortage of Nobel laureates who believe in conspiracy theories or promote dubious medical treatments. Talking about "science literacy" is usually just how geeks convince themselves that their beliefs can't be wrong.
Every generation the advice on which way to put your kid to sleep flip flops.
It would be shamefully foolish to disregard all the incredible advances and technologies that modern medicine offers. It would be equally shamefully foolish to think it’s not still deeply flawed.
We'll make life changing decisions based on the opinion/advice of 1 individual, while shopping around on a home project or car repair that's +/- $5k.
It seems again like a combination of shortage of medical workers and the indirect nature of medical payment. If I knew up front that walking in and getting 3 medical opinions would cost me X, and I didn't need any pre-approval from insurance, or risk denials.. I'd just go do it more. But the system is so opaque that I don't know I can get those answers readily, or believe the numbers are real and won't result in random bills later.
Further, the next step after figuring out the cost of getting options would then e getting a quote for the actual resulting medical care recommends is opaque due to differing payment %s & co-pays by procedure, etc.
I had a really bad sprain about two years ago to the point where my partner had to help me on and off the toilet. Eventually I took off work, went to urgent care, and paid $200 for them to basically say "well it's not broken, we could do an MRI otherwise we don't know what you want us to do". Booking an appointment with a GP would have taken around a month. They won't be able to do anything long term but will recommend a physical therapist. All said and done it's probably a $5-10k ordeal and weeks until I could actually see any progress, plus work time missed. Big surprise, I didn't actually end up going to see a doctor. Recovery sucked and some movements still aren't quite right.
There’s nothing more quintessentially American than “not knowing how much you are going to pay for something until you owe it.” You go for a hospital visit and nobody has even a remote, order-of-magnitude idea of what you are going to pay. But you have to sign a doc right away that says “you agree to pay whatever number we eventually come up with!” And then you slowly get dozens of bills from individual doctors and hospital workers over the next 4 months. It’s absurd.
Indeed. In my country we have a public healthcare system. I also have private insurance, which I use sometimes because you can get consultations and tests much faster; but I wouldn't do anything invasive with the private insurance before getting an opinion from a public doctor first. The incentives aren't well aligned in private healthcare. For me, the combo (trust diganoses from the public system more, but use private when convenient) seems to work well.
Public healthcare doesn't cover dentists, though, and to be honest, from other people's experience, I don't trust them much. I haven't visited one in over 20 years, and so far I haven't experienced pain or any other annoying symptoms other than some slight gum bleeding once per year or so which seems to resolve by itself by brushing and flossing more thoroughly than normal for a few days. I know it's risky and this may come to bite me later. Fingers crossed.
(Edit: it turns out orthodontist is not like ophthalmologist).
Did you mean an oral surgeon?
But at the same time it is very important to brush you teeth twice a day and floss weekly. You should also avoid sugary food as much as possible.
Dentistry is much like Realtors, they like to take credit for very little actual work.
"If I'm not here to confirm people are brushing regularly everyone would lose all their teeth"
"I'm so glad I could sell your house for 500k. Without me you may have never sold it"
For me daily makes a big difference. If I leave it until weekly my gums will start to suffer for it.
I use the little floss picks, as they're much easier to manage for me than floss, and - here's something - they're reusable. Rinse them off like you would your toothbrush and you can keep those suckers going for a long time. You can also get them made from bio-plastic, so that they'll degrade once they go to landfill.
The double string ones are really good, as they catch a lot of gunk in the gap between them.
Here's an article about the study: https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/raisins-and-dental-health/
Sugar.
Thankfully it's just enough to the side to not be visible so I am getting away without one. (Though I think it's also problematic long term, because remaining teeth would shift.)
Never again to trust a dentist, no matter if it's a private clinic in developed country with supposedly great healthcare. Always talk, discuss and research and ask around enough to make own judgement...
My dentist also told me that tooth extraction is a last-ditch effort. But that come sooner than you would like; after one rounds of antibiotics, if the pain come back but there are no apparent mechanical defect in the tooth yet the roots are blurry on the x-rays, the probability that a root canal treatment would be successful is quite small and extraction followed by an implant is your best bet.
It’s hard to shop around for dentists but when you find a good one it’s life changing.
I can't really common about the US, but here in the UK the quality of healthcare is shocking bad. Although we may have the opposite problem, where instead of doing unnecessary procedures to increase costs, the NHS generally tries to avoid doing anything unless you're dying.
I had some pain in my abdomen a few years back and had persistently elevated liver enzymes. My doctor told continuously told me not worry about it and would say the pain was probably because I was sitting funny and other nonsense. In their opinion I was too young to have liver problems so there was no point in doing any further tests.
Fed up, I decided to do my own research and pay for my own tests. From this I found out that I have a fairly rare generic condition which makes me highly predisposed to liver disease and NAFLD. Certainly not the end of the world, but it pissed me off a bit because the disease could have progressed had I taken their advice and simply ignored it.
Around this time I also had a family friend who was the same age as me. She went to the doctors repeatedly over the course of a year describing several symptoms she was experiencing just to be dismissed. Turns out she actually had cervical cancer, but they never ran any tests and kept telling her it was probably nothing to worry about. By the time she found out she had cancer it was stage four and she died a few weeks later. She was 28 and had two kids.
Like you I believe in listening to experts. Most experts know what they're talking about and generally give good advice, but it's important to keep in mind the conditions experts operate in. Here in the UK the NHS has neither the time or money to give you high quality healthcare. It doesn't really matter if you see the best doctor in the world, if they can't spent the time and money running the tests you need you're not going to get a good diagnosis.
I have seen this in my personal life time and again. I have seen it in my professional life time and again.
The only way though the mine field is to take personal ownership over your Healthcare, you need to learn more about what ailes you than the doctors know. You need to be confident in this knowledge enough to challenge them and walk out to receive better care at any moment. This is why people say that healthcare us such a trap in the US particularly. If you are injured and incapacitated you can't advocate for yourself, and if you don't have the support infrastructure in place in your personal life we are just one medical event away from financial and physical ruin.
> The only way though the mine field is to take personal ownership over your Healthcare
Shortly after graduating from university, when I no longer had access to student health, I started hunting for a regular family physician. The guy I found... my first "let's get to know each other/annual physical" kind of appointment he said "Look, I don't know if you noticed but there are a lot of people out in the waiting room. My staff here is great, but things happen. Maybe they call you with test results and you miss the voicemail. Maybe the lab forgets to send the results. Maybe the fax from the lab gets stuck to another piece of paper. We're all human here, and I try really hard to treat each one of my patients as a real human and not just a list of symptoms on a page. If I'm going to be your doctor, there's only one thing I ask: be your own advocate. If you're expecting to hear back from us and you don't, or if you feel like we've missed something, or you have questions, or... anything really, please don't hesitate to follow up. I promise I'm going to do my best to look after your health, but you care about it more than anyone else in the world. Does that work for you?"
He was, by far, the best damned doctor I've ever had. And then, apparently, one day he had a serious family emergency back home and vanished, never to return :(.
He know the realities of the system and is doing his best to get his patients good care.
It's like my first day of high school. I had a history teacher. The entire first class of history in high school was devoted to knowing yourself. He told us in basic terms how our bodies worked, that we shouldn't try to dp homework after a big meal, how we should use our resources, how we should be respectful, how learning the laws and history of our country could personally impact or protect us from injustice.
He treated us like equal human beings he truly wanted to help, not just work he had to do that day.
You're doctor did the same, blessings on him.
Everyone in the UK should get to experience a private consultation just once. The difference between the rushed 10mins you get with the NHS and the considered 30mins you get private is amazing. You leave feeling like you’ve been taken care of and all your questions have been answered. It’s only when you see this you can see just how bad the quality of care in the NHS is at the moment. We need to stop equating the NHS with the people that work for it and start calling it out for how god awful it is. We’ve made it a dirty that can’t be criticised properly when it sorely needs to be.
However, I do want to provide an anecdote to illustrate that private healthcare is not perfect. I had some persistent pain in my foot. Realized I wouldn't get anywhere with the NHS so I went private. The person I saw had an excellent manner. They suggested some fairly gnarly surgery. Said I should think about it and in the meantime they gave me an anti-inflammatory injection. My problem cleared up in about two weeks. What was wrong: I have really really wide feet (seriously; they are wider than the widest setting on the foot measuring device they use at shoe shops.) I didn't know this. I was wearing Chuck Taylors, which are very narrow, and they were pinching my feet. I didn't wear my Chucks over the two weeks and I figured out what was wrong in that time. What I learned: everyone has a toolbox they want to reach into. In this case I was seen by a surgeon so they of course turned to surgery as solution. Always be your own advocate, to the best of your ability, in healthcare. (I thought the surgeon might have said something about the width of my feet given they spent so much time looking at feet.)
There might be an age component to it: the risk of it not healing correctly increases with age.
This is true for fairly simple cases. But when something is complex or very serious you want a true multidisciplinary team that sees the most cases per annum - that is the NHS.
A private consultant in a nice office with a very nice efficient secretary is great for their particular expertise but outside of that poor. This is based on more experience personally and with family than I would wish anyone to have.
I was diagnosed after a blood test (in the US) but they just put me on a statin (high cholesterol medication) that fixed only what the blood test showed and did not treat the problem. Now I’m having to, with 10 fewer years than when learned it, drastically adjust my life and diet to ensure I won’t develop additional complications.
Why are we so hilariously bad at treating chronic problems?
Btw through generic genealogy, I’ve managed to pinpoint which branch of my family that this comes from and they’re all from Yorkshire. Given how rare it is, there is a nonzero chance we are cousins of some sort if you have semi-recent ancestral origins there.
They time their appointments ever 2 minutes so you’re expected to arrive early. Once you start, they wiz you around to about a dozen tests including getting hooked up to electrodes while running on a treadmill. After less than an hour you see a doctor who goes through everything for about 15 very detailed and thoughtful minutes.
The entire thing is FREE! Completely publicly funded.
I don’t know much about healthcare but this type of thing always struck me as a missing apparatus of healthcare in the US. Although apparently Favoloro (who invented some kind of bypass surgery) founded the Institute after being inspired by the Cleveland Clinic.
Would love to hear other people’s thoughts on this because I tell that story all the time!
USA healthcare system burns me out.
I don't know how effective it is, and how much of it is theater.
They may not know either.
Most of our research is studying how well treatments work on "patients that came in with _____ symptoms and we found test X Y and Z was outside of the normal range".
Does that mean you should use the same treatments when you have X Y and Z out of range but without symptoms? We often don't know.
Interesting. I was considering commenting that your experience sounds a lot like the VIP (using the term loosely here, it's much more accessible than "multi-millionaire") care available at the Mayo Clinic. You can accomplish in a day or two what would typically take months to years in many areas of the US, including mine.
where would be the conspiracy in your experience anyway?
> But that experience shook me and forever changed my trust in the dental industry.
don't trust any industry. industry is always about making money and keeping a comfortable status quo. sometimes this is achieved through conspiracies.
I think that term has lost all meaning. A more appropriate term for someone who no longer blindly trusts expert consensus without question is an inquisitive skeptic who takes in expert opinions and applies reason, judgement, analysis and data to determine a course of action.
It’s becoming more and more recognized that expert consensus has become highly politicized and that the problem with blindly following the science is that science often follows the money.
The problem for the most part in all industries is we have moved from a system of experts to a system of credentials. Now one would say that in order to get a credential in something one must be an "expert" but this is far far from the truth, there are all kinds of competing incentives to ensure an ever increasing supply of "credentialed" professionals that have nothing to do with validation of their expertise in a given field or subject.
It does not matter if it something like an electrician, or brain surgeon, from teaching, to physics, and everything in between including medicine, we favor credentials now not expertise
Largely the consumer public simply looks to see if this person as the correct credential. license, etc for the given job... Consumers often lack the resources, information, or decisions tree in most instances to look for any indicators of actual knowledge in the field beyond that credential
This is true. I have no clue how to check the expertise of my dentist, apart from using my own mental bullshit detector (of limited use here) and reading reviews by others (also of questionable use, because who reviews their dentist? And where?).
The analogous problem exists for certain kinds of expensive products with the property that they usually work well, but sometimes become flaky. Think a washing machine. Who posts a review about their washing machine four years post-date that it's still going strong? And absence of base rate information makes absolute numbers of bad reviews mostly meaningless.
that is a different problem, consumerism killed that. There used to be several media companies that focused on long term durability of "durable goods" like washing machines and such
But today most people buy new appliances not when they fail but when they need to upgrade to the latest technology, or because new government regulations makes them unfeasible to use / service, or because the Calendar function on their smart fridge does not work with google cloud anymore (true story), etc...
From my experience, the biggest issue is that a lot of the appliances and other gadgets we have these days are very complex. You have to be an electrical engineers, software engineer and a mechanical engineer, or a big service company that employs all three, to be able to fix anything.
Additionally it's sometimes really difficult to find service manuals for a lot of these things. If your doodat is flashing error code E-71-X1-C and the user manual you have just says "call for service", what are you going to do about it? You typically need pretty serious google-fu magic to find enough information to start figuring out what's wrong.
When my dryer broke several years ago I think I found the proper service manual for it on a site that looked exactly like a SEO spam site and seriously sketchy. Downloading the PDF I was praying my anti-virus application was up-to-date.
Call for service.
It’s at least better than the populist solution of anti-experts chosen on the basis of charisma or “truthiness.”
Your first part is more challenging because what you find is the people with true expertise in their field are often far to busy and/or have no interest in validating other experts so the people doing the validation at best are on the lowest end of the spectrum of "experts" which naturally causes the spectrum to expand.
Further you will find in many many many fields the method of obtain a credential is has no connection to another expert vouching for you, it is matter of simply passing some kind of standardized test, and completing a required amount of training
For example one that has been in the recent news is Airline Pilots where you have to have a fix number of flight hours to be a commercial pilots, many pilots get those hours by fly pipe or other utility line check operations which is done a clear day, fixed altitude, fixed path and with limited deviation. So the value of those hours would be far less than the same person flying in varied conditions, in varied locations, etc.
Ask anybody who’s experienced a “chronic” illness about the “experts” and they’ll tell you a tale or two. The experts are great until they have a case that is unusual. The don’t have the time or knowledge to treat you properly. You get passed from “expert” to “expert” each time having your hopes dashed. You start feeling like a conspiracy nut chatting with other patients online sharing what’s anecdotally helped. After running into this issue more than once I’ve lost all blind trust in medical experts. I’ll verify what they tell me as best I can and get second opinions if necessary. In one case I was passed up the chain of experts until I finally found the right one myself after a year, and it still blows my mind that this wasn’t the first referral. The system is at the same time incredible and awful.
I wouldn't assume that - just because the money isn't coming from your pocket directly, it's inevitable there are doctors that milk the system. But you'd think bureaucrats whose job it is to assess the legitimacy of requests to the NHS (or equivalent institution in your own country) for payment might be harder to swindle than your typical patient.
Truth is that modern medicine still knows much less than is often assumed, let alone individual doctors. There's an absurd amount of potential for LLMs here.
> There's an absurd amount of potential for LLMs here.
The problem is not that doctors are stupid, the problem is that a lot of ailments are just not easily diagnosed. Even if the doctor has one (or more) suspicions what the red rash on your skin is, there just aren't any tests for many conditions. Many diseases are only diagnosed by symptoms and the underlying cause is unknown.
And even if you get a diagnosis, there is often nothing you can do.
LLMs are not going to magically come up with cures.
https://coinbrain.com/coins/bnb-0xb131f5e8ec273af4652eecdd87...
This will change everything
There aren't any tests that the doctor has on hand, because the doctor is a unit in the medical system designed to provision affordable care instead of a scientist attempting to cure you. It would be too expensive to test you, especially for something that will probably go away on its own.
Everyone who talks to the patient, who touches them, and who is consulted by the doctor, gets to charge. Yup, that means if another doctor happens to walk by, and confirms what he just told me, he gets to charge me again (double).
Feels like theatre every time I go to the doctor, so I just tell the secretary "I'm talking to you and Doc, no one else", and just quietly stare at anyone else who pops in.
Usually insurance covers this stuff, but I was uninsured when I discovered it .
This is accurate. Years ago I had a kidney stone and the GP asked for an IVU (Intravenous urography) image to make sure about the size. The report prepared by the radiologist had the statement "operation is required".
When I got back to my GP just laughed sarcastically and told me that it was nothing to be worried of. He also said "the radiologist just wanted to return the favor, in case the GP wanted to operate". He was sick of this scheme too, but there was nothing he could do.
I was so pissed by this I created a way to find experts. People that actually studied the issue, have actual publish papers on the topic. What I found was no one cared. No one wanted "experts" - they want a specialist that is in their network and close.
Example of searching for mohs surgury. https://www.opendoctor.io/research/?research_papers=mohs&zip...
I struggled with back pain and told to go to a neurologist and informed my GP where I would and wouldn't go. The doc I was referred to was a no-go since I know him personally and he's a lying piece of shit in his personal life, I'm not trusting him with my back! Docs could NOT understand. "But he's so nice." Screw that.
Time and again, family and friends settle. I understand the insurance component, but even then, can you not find better?
And thank you for your work. It's very cool.
In US healthcare you have to be your own advocate and be willing to push. The system breaks down if you don't have a routine and obvious illness.
Now dentists...when we had money we went to a family friend. He still totally f'd us and did unnecessary work. It's only now that I have a cash only country dentist that I trust my dentist again. Crazy part is the cash only dentist ends up being cheaper than my previous copay/premiums insurance dentists.
My wife and I have both had to see various specialists. Some had very long wait times, many didn't, and of those that did, we were (fortunately) able to call around to different clinics to find one that wasn't too bad.
The exceptions are part of that data set
Really...
A few minutes research suggests it's not that expensive. (As little as ~2000/year).
However, that is beside the point. Believe me, I hate explaining simple, simple things--but the person I was responding to is probably comfortably middle or upper-middle class and could afford a miserable 2000/year on a doctor. He doesn't have to become "rich enough", and almost 100 percent of the people in this thread don't have to either.
2 k is a lot for even those at the 50th percentile and extremely significant for those below it.
Min wage earners make about 30k, so that 2k is 6.6% of thier income....
I mean, the wait times sometimes are, but they vary by province. More conservative provinces have worse wait times. That is not surprising given that the provincial conservative government are all actively attempting to sabotage public healthcare so we can move to an American style system. A system where we will all pay more, and still see similar wait times anyway.
MAID is not actively proposed as a way to save resources.
This feels like a pretty glaring generalization. If we look at the actual data, the story becomes a little more nuanced [1]. "Conservative" provinces have wait times that are a couple of days to a couple of weeks higher than national average (assuming we call BC, AB, SK and MB "conservative" [2]), but then again almost all of the maritimes provinces (which are considered strongly liberal-leaning) have abysmally bad wait times relative to the average (10-20 weeks worse).
Overall, the average is ~half a year anyways, which is pretty rough regardless.
[1] - https://www.fraserinstitute.org/file/waiting-your-turn-2021-... [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Canadian_federal_election, "Results by province and territory
And nice lies dude. They all have over double the national average!
Don’t use Fraser institute for sources. They are a far right “think” tank. If they posted it, it’s a lie or misrepresentation.
I'm not aware of the reverse (admittedly, that would require more than just $$).
The reason to go to Mexico is price. The reason to go to the U.S. is quality.
How about for Canada vs the U.S.?
If you're a Canadian citizen, Canadian healthcare is cheaper, but generally has much longer wait times.
U.S. healthcare is much more expensive, but much more quickly available, and specialty care (e.g., rare disease treatment) is much better.
She will be able to see a psychiatrist "when one is available in the fall."
https://web.archive.org/web/20230809170345/https://www.thegl...
Getting a routine gynecological appointment for my wife any time in the next six months is impossible. I gave up on trying to get an appointment with an allergist for myself, even after getting a referral. What you describe is common in the US too, even for those with means. I cannot imagine what it is like for somebody who doesn't have money and insurance.
I wanted to get a sleep study done to get to the bottom of my occasional insomnia. My PCP at the time put in the pulmonologist referral (because this hospital network required a referral to get a sleep study done, which is insane in its own right, but that's neither here nor there).
This was in January. His next available appointment? March! For a friggin sleep study! And I have a HDHP + HSA and was going to pay full boat!
(He also prescribed me with an antipsychotic that can double as a sleep aid at low dosages, which I didn't take because five minutes of research into it made it obvious that taking that for extended periods of time is bad news bears. I stopped seeing him after that.)
(For those looking for answers like I was, I eventually stumbled upon Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, or CBT-I. It's essentially a rigid sliding window-style sleep schedule plus challenge therapy to make you rethink how you approach sleep. I've been doing this for six months now and it has been transformational. Best part? No meds!)
[1] Or shit, even a PCP that accepts new patients.
Really, you just engaged in deception and promulgation of propaganda intended to push people toward neofascist ideology.
Shame on you.
Went from nothing/reluctance to popular for some segments of the population
100% the same thing on this side of the pond, US healthcare isn’t special here.
To be fair, doctors are usually overworked and on a human level I understand that the system is a bit broken, but it's still infuriating when it's your health that is suffering.
It gave me a new perspective on that kind of work. From my/our point of view, I was the most important person in the room and my problems really really matter.
From the doctor or dentists POV, I'm one a long long list of people they're seeing that day. It's a health care production line, and even if they have the inclination to be equally caring about everyone - which is a rare quality, because a good medical professionals are only in it for the money - they just don't have the time.
This is not an excuse unprofessional behaviour. But it made me realise that self-advocacy works because you're asking - maybe demanding - more than the production line gives you by default.
Also, medicine is incredibly complicated. And the research is often very low quality.
And that's not taking into account Big Pharma trying to tout its products, whether or not they're suitable or effective.
The most depressing thing recently has been the professional response to Covid. In the UK countless doctors have aggressively given up masking, even in settings with immunocompromised patients.
It's really made it obvious that some doctors are just in it for the money, a good few are phoning it in, surprisingly many have quite irrational beliefs, and the caring expert professionals are much rarer than they should be.
It’s just “extraordinary”.
People have weird habits, weird diets, are exposed to weird chemicals in small amounts over extended periods of time, etc. There are all kinds of genetic factors where something can be really minor for most people and debilitating for others. There are all kinds or problems or diseases that people can have, and there can be weird combinations that interact or provide an overall confusing array of symptoms. And it's all mixed up with the patient's brain, which may be exacerbating or compensating in all kinds of ways (psychologically or through behaviors that the patient develops).
It may be because they see a wider range of illnesses and this empathy/awareness might not work well with the patients are of varying ethnicity and race but they’re pretty good if you look past the exterior - shabby offices, gruff manner.
That's with 3 different people and a handful of different doctors. They are actually pretty eager to look inside your stomach out here heheh. I'm really sorry to hear that happened to your friend though! I hope they're doing better now!
Private healthcare is basically broken out the gate, public healthcare can be much better but it still does need to be funded.
Much of Europe went wild assuming that we would always have 5 to 7 workers per person retired to care for, and I won’t be surprised if we get down to 1 to 2 in the next 50 years.
That’s a type of system collapse people aren’t prepared for.
Clearly both systems have benefits and drawbacks.
The main complaint about the UK system that people quote is "it takes a while to see a doctor" but that's true about most people here in the US as well. If you have not top-line insurance or live in a slightly rural area or a million other things.
Not sure if this practice is just shit or if all of them are. They then have the audacity to strike too. I've had absolutely zero sympathy for them since the months long ordeal of being in pain and taking pills that made me feel worse rather than better. Fucking disgraceful is what it has become.
Humans don't have a full understanding of everything, and in fact it's quite the opposite, in that we don't understand almost everything. Almost all paths are untrodden. It's fine to look where others haven't and come up with your own theories and ideas, as long as you retain a healthy skepticism and back things up with data as much as you can.
Science and exploration should not use fear of social reprisal as a guide.
Until COVID came around and unearthed the absolute hoards of dO yOuR oWn ReSeArCh imbeciles. Now the sensible practice of getting a second opinion and exploring other options/doctors has been mixed up with the kooks: extreme politics and actual conspiracy theories, to the point where it’s hard to take any of it seriously.
When someone now says they don’t trust doctors, you have to dig deeper to understand if it’s someone genuinely seeking out other options, or if it’s one of Those People who’ve gone off the deep end.
For example, Western health authorities used to be absolutely certain that viruses could not be airborne (outside of very specific medical procedures), even though they did not have any good reason or evidence to back that up: it was just an old idea that happened to fit in with their priors, so generations of experts kept parroting it until horror unfolded.
God didn’t do it
Gravity is the curvature of spacetime
Things are not attracted to the planet through static electricity
Covid is real
Vaccines work
Rich mother fuckers do NOT have our best interests at heart
Intelligent aliens have not visited earth
People are called conspiracy nuts for being conspiracy nuts. Not for “taking less trodden paths”. Getting real tired of the HNs new “wahh wahh, we’re such major victims for believing stupid shit and being called out on it!” And just trying to paint it as “less trodden paths”.
It is never used in the spirit of promoting insightful discussion.
Instead it is used to shut down a line of inquiry in its tracks. It’s like calling someone an anti-semite.
It is used as a soft form of censorship, to disqualify the mere idea of engaging in the specifics of an argument.
If someone dismisses a comment by implying it is a conspiracy instead of offering a substantive rebuttal of why the comment is mistaken, it reduces the quality of the entire community.
I think we can do better, but more people need to call out this bad behavior.
I reserve the right to dismiss low-quality posts with a low-quality answer. And yes, that's a judgement call. There is no way around that.
People get called conspiracy nuts when they make big claims with no real evidence. That is the opposite of 'science and exploration'. The difference is always evidence. Go on a conspiracy site and ask for hard evidence of anything and they will get very upset.
On the other hand, from the administrator's perspective:
"Your team of four people treat about one patient a week, why am I paying your salaries again?"
In our universe, I probably won't receive that much medical care in my lifetime.
(But I know I was lucky - my oncologist could order a river to reverse itself and it probably would.)
I don't really know how it works in the US but here in Brazil it's actually pretty easy to order laboratory tests and imaging studies. There's taxpayer funded public health care but it can't handle the demands of the entire population so people would rather pay for the ultrasound or CT scan than wait two years for the government to provide it. An ultrasound costs about $30, an MRI costs about $150 and the price of a CT scan is somewhere between those two.
Don't even get me started on diseases where we have medication that sort of works with tons of side effect where no significant progress has been made for decades. If you're alergic to the said medication or your side effects make it a no go, tough luck!
But this is true for every thing in the planet. Data modelling, computer programming, building, everything. Name something that the unusual is not more complicated and difficult to do.
Why would anyone think that it would not be true for the health field??
I think the problem is people think health is magical and everything is known. Because they choose not to educate themselves.
The problem is most doctors have absolutely no humility and will never admit to not knowing something. I don't see that behavior among engineers.
That is incredibly surprising.
Sometimes (when possible) you just reset yourself: stop all medications for some days, so that the collateral effects are gone and you're left with the original condition (aggravated, of course, because you left the one medication that was working with the 3 others that were just giving you wrong symptoms), and then another "expert" begins from the "start".
The practice of medicine is not science. The practice of medicine can be informed by science - to a degree that is almost entirely up to the practitioner. ; but it remains more art than science. The distinction is similar to that between an aviation maintenance and aerospace engineering.
Sometimes doctors are just out of their depth.
Which is which though? As I understand it, aviation maintenance is quite rigorous, systematic, and informed by and taking into account every mistake made in the past.
When you compare their behaviors to IT it all starts making sense.
Honestly of all the professions that could be enhanced by AI, medicine has the most to gain. An AI can remember a much larger data set than any human and look for correlations among many more dimensions.
They are so unreasonably effective for being, fundamentally, word predictors.
As do I.
I also nearly died myself about 2 years ago. Appendicitis of all things. Unusual presentation. I didn't see it. Surgeons didn't see it. Gastroenterologists didn't see it. Ultrasounds were inconclusive. I couldn't believe it when I saw the CT scan. I underwent surgery. Twice. The infection would not go away despite 5 intravenous antibiotics 24/7. They wanted to operate a third time and I became convinced I would die if I went under the knife again. Then they somehow managed to fly in an interventional radiologist who found and drained a few abscesses. 40 days I was at the hospital.
I feel so grateful to be alive.
a lot of the 'magic' around being human evaporates when you have to quantify the 'worth' of any particular organ
untangling this closed-source blob always reveals secrets: 2023 just had an update to anatomy! https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/newly-discovered-a...
Hopefully medical science will keep advancing rapidly here..
I’m hoping AI systems can help. A good medical AI should be able to stay abreast of all the research, know your personal medical history and suggest and evaluate any and all medical tests that are needed. Doctors will hate it, but I expect AIs will give much more accurate diagnoses than humans before long.
It's a really ideal use case for AI - not only figuring these things out but also doing things like clinical trial and research matching.
In neurology at least, I think a lot of the problem is that everyone is hyper-specialized. Luckily for us, my wife's insurance company convinced a generalist neurologist to come out of retirement and examine her, which put us on the path to effective treatment. But yes, that whole experience completely soured me on blind trust in the medical profession
Doctors tend to believe that female patients exaggerate pain in comparison to male patients, in accordance with stereotypes that portray men as "stoic" and women as "emotional". The bias is systemic, with female doctors often assuming the stereotype too[1].
You can trace this bias back through medical literature which (often subconsciously) reiterates these stereotypes[2]. It shows up in many statistics, such as the difference in wait times for analgesics: women reporting pain had to wait an average of 30% longer than men.[3]
But a key cause of the problem is worse than just assumption of stereotypes: it's that modern medicine still knows far more about men than it does women. For centuries, the primary medical research and literature was done by men, about men, for the treatment of men. Most of the clinical trials performed in the 20th century enrolled far fewer women than men, and often _none at all_.[4]
Of course, gender is not the only bias that shows up in medicine. Age, race, (dis)ability, body shape, and economic/social status are all useful factors to keep in mind when considering why certain people, even entire sectors of society, aren't getting the treatment they should.
- [1] https://www.dovepress.com/the-roles-of-gender-and-profession... - [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845507/ - [3] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1553-2712... - [4] https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/nov/13/the-fem...
But to be honest: There are also some motivated and honest doctors. If you find one of these, stick to them.
Also the very standard cases, they can mess up very badly.
"The system is at the same time incredible and awful."
The science behind the medicine is awesome, but the standard implementation is horrible and not up to at all, where we could be.
1. Don't mouthbreathe and don't overbreathe. See "Breath - The New Science of A Lost Art" by James Nestor for why and how.
2. Don't eat sugar, it's a chronic poison. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
3. Min. 1 hr of physical activity per day. Your body is not meant to sit all the time.
4. Avoid noise of the city life as much as you can. It leads to chronic stress and thus chronic diseases. Noise-cancelling earphones may help.
Why aren't you using connections on a daily basis to get reliable services?
Except my teeth were my second teeth, and they were half broken. I was walking around with half-blackened by the rot teeth, which caused all sorts of health problems on top of all the bullying and the first kiss kids tend to take came to me after I fixed the teeth.
And don't get me started with my chronic illness that I've been looking for diagnosis for the last 10+ years.
while a dentist should of course make sure to double check if its the permanent teeth and all that, I feel that your dad did not really fulfill his role as a proper parent here
I think what happened to that dentist is he changed his diagnostic because of an external factor, like realising that removing the teeth is less risky with regards to getting sued by you.
To be fair, in your story the "former head of the province’s dental association" apparently did know his craft, indicating that competence is rewarded in dentistry also...
There are a lot of doctors and dentists, and as in any field, mastership of a profession is rare. So you did the obvious and correct thing of finding someone more competent when you had doubts.
That would honestly have reinforced my trust in medicine more than do the opposite...
Seemed fine to me, but my father insisted to ask a friend of his who is a dentist. Turns out my wisdom teeth were completely fine and none needed pulling. My pain just stemmed from me grinding my teeth at night.
For which magnesium (try different types of Mg-salts) helps many! (never heard that from a dentist, again, possssibllyy because the solution is not sold in their shop)
Always do your own research. Ask them consequences and how sure they are.
And take into consideration the impact of treatments and diagnosis to the life quality of yourself or loved ones. At times can be hard for doctors and others to look beyond their own worldview.
Personally I’ve had this eczema where I found the correct cream by reading the research on it, and later found out this is also the official advice. Most doctors here just prescribe an old cream out of habit, that contains hormones and often creates worse side effects.
But a bigger diagnosis mistake was a close family member diagnosed with a very bad gen defect that would cause liver failure within a few years. He wanted the kid to start taking unpleasant medicines to be sure. He told us to get bloodwork done (without mentioning the costs) but in the end couldn’t find enough genes that had the mistakes. He wanted to do even more bloodwork being convinced there needed to be 2 genes with the defect, but I clearly told him he was going in uncharted territory, after doing the extra bloodwork he had to come back and agree he was wrong.
One defect gene was found and in extreme health circumstances liver values were found that matched the pattern of a certain disease. Which is why he was convinced it was wrong.
He was a well intentioned doctor, but these academics doctors get obsessed with analysing and diagnosis without always understanding the costs for the patients. Although they try to. In the meantime our family thought the kid was going to die for months and made significant unnecessary costs.
One search on Reddit and many people just said to use petrolium gel. Bam fixed it up in two days! Costs me about $3 a year to control this now.
Most of the expensive moisturizers is going to be 80-90% petrolatum and a bunch of crap that's more likely to irritate than help (but smells nice!).
Don't get me started on "non-greasy" formulations... it's the greasiness that makes it work!
Pro-tip: put your moisturizer on just after washing. You want to trap in all that water!
I took him to my dentist who found a single tooth that may have a cavity but it's too early to be sure. A year later he's had one filling. And that one was not any of the teeth the other dentist wanted to drill. He flosses in public bathrooms.
They obviously was a cash grab and were going to just drill the fuck out of his mouth to maximize medicaid payments.
That local dentist I guess saw a blank check when I walked in the door and tried to convince me I had 5 cavities that needed filling. I told him to finish just the cleaning and I’d check back in with my military dentist.
Military dentist later looked me over again and said I had one slowly developing potential cavity to keep an eye on. That’s it.
A lot of dentists are apparently unethical hack shops.
From my point of view (patient), I feels like dentists base their treatment recommendations on how much kickback they’re getting from medical corporations (Invisalign anyone?) and biased papers.
I wonder why dentistry is so far removed from the rest of the medical profession on this. Not that MDs are immune to the above but it feels to me like it’s not as bad as in dentistry.
Anyways beyond that, dentistry sits in a very interesting position where there isn't a whole lot that can be done (without major breakthrough). It's why so much is based on preventative measure. It's also why the field feels "antiquated" in a way, we're still using simple instruments to scrape the teeth (or inside the tooth when it comes to root canals), or yanking the entire tooth out. We haven't got much farther than cavemen using stones to clean plaque in that way, besides the pain mitigation.
It's the one field that is ripe for revolutionary improvements if it weren't for corporations constantly pushing their garbage studies.
It might work, but the conflict of interest is there and you’ll never know if there wasn’t a superior/cheaper/more suitable alternative.
Ditto Oral B toothbrushes. Or Pedigree Pal at vets.
He said he could see no indication of decay that would need treatment, and all the 'fillings' I had were more like sealants in the enamel, none of which reached the dentin, and any of them could have been avoided by a more wait and see approach.
I saw 5+ dentists on the public health system that all had the same cavalier approach, and it's hard to assume it wasn't to line their own pockets.
UK NHS diagnosis was to pull 4 front top teeth out. I asked a relative (a doctor working in a public hospital but not a dentist) who advised to absolutely don't do that without even seeing him in person (COVID lockdown BS).
A local private dentist agreed and wanted 5k to fix his teeth (remove cavities, put fillings under general anesthetics).
In the end we went to Russia and got it done for 1k.
That's public healthcare for you!
His teeth have been fine for years, not long until he loses them naturally.
Why?
This is the same thing with doctors for any difficult disease to treat. You will tons of different opinions based on the same facts that are available to them.
It makes you seriously wonder what kind of expertise is that in the end?
It fixed itself as well.
The whole point of consulting a professional is so they can provide you with the necessary information to make important decisions. It's up to them to explain things to you so that you understand well enough to make an informed decision.
Unsatisfactory, meandering answers means you aren't getting the information you need to decide and you should absolutely seek another professional until you find one you trust. In fact, when we don't know something, the professional thing to do is to admit it and refer you to another professional who does.
About a week later I fell against a large wooden block in the classroom and knocked the other top front tooth clean out.
I went for something over a year without top front teeth, but my adult teeth came in early, so it wasn't 2 or 3 years like it might have been.
This was a long time ago, and I still have both the adult teeth, although one of them died when I got hit in the face with a football in the third grade.
All to say that n=1 but it likely wouldn't have been the worst thing if the two teeth had come out.
I'm a grown-ass adult now, and I haven't had issues like this since my late teens.
Went full engineer and finally met the right people.
Medicine is a marvel, but it’s a opportunity cost. You meet with people who have 10 minutes to pattern match you, which works for probably close to all the cases they see, until it doesn’t, and it’s you.
It's completely reasonable to believe in modern medicine, but also to remember that humans are imperfect and have all sorts of biases and limitations when practicing modern medicine. Add on top of that how most health care systems make things much more difficult than they need to be, for both the doctor and the patient.
It’s stated at the bottom that the original article is from 1997. COVID doesn’t factor into it.
This can be applied to almost everything. Looking at average software developers around, I see people with 10 years of experience who have no idea how anything works, they just copy paste the same CRUD APIs for their whole career, never really learning anything, trying to understand, just coasting through corporate life. Half of people are worse than 'average' person, this applies to everything and it's especially evident with doctors. They'll just tell you to wait and see, take vitamins or straight out ignore you. They might not know any better, or just think they know everything, you never know because you're not an expert. As an example of this I highly recommend reading Wired's article on Lee Holloway.
Then I went to a different dentist (I had to cause I moved) and he had the wait and see approach. I didn't tell you yet that I had a chronic inflammation (abscess) under the molar. A year or so later, I finally went to the dental stomatologist and he suggested oxazepam. What an experience (both the drug and the removal of the inflammation). Then the healing process came. And I even had some stomach pains from all the ibuprofen (too long w/o stomach protector). Ever since that I always use a stomach protector with ibuprofen, just to be sure. No stomach protector, no ibuprofen.
We were very happy with this dentist. Since it became a bit too impractical we now are at yet another dentist who's in our neighborhood and literally next to our kid's school. Very practical, but we were happier with the previous dentist.
Now our 3 year old has damage on all 4 of his milk canines, having damaged tooth enamel. We don't know what or why, only difference I can tell with his older sister is he's been going on with breastfeeding longer, and he liked chewing on stuff more than her (his teeth and mouth also have a bit different form; more my wife's than mine). The rest seems fine. The dentist guilt tripped us into that I'd probably not been brushing his teeth well enough (because of COVID my wife was waiting with our daughter, she'd have given him a firm reply but I just listened and took it in), but I'm pretty sure we did this correct (perhaps too well?); twice a day since his first tooth showed up. So I'm considering going for a second opinion.
The beauty is my kids are freely insured for teeth until their 18th in The Netherlands, after that they're on their own. But until then, the government takes care of their costs. I know it ain't like that in certain other (even rich) countries.
Dentists are also business people, and there are strong monetary incentives for them to upsell.
That's not to defend the behavior, but I think we should acknowledge the problem is systemic and that a non profit healthcare approach would be more appropriate for the vast majority of situations.
My current dentist's niche is NOT performing anything that is unnecessary. A lot of people are taken aback when they say everything looks good. Makes for a great culture in his office.
I am sure you came across many staff engineers with +10 years of exp that will give weird ideas too and architecture decisions, tech choice etc.. it’s everywhere not just for dentists.
That was twenty-five years ago. Haven't been to a dentist since. My teeth are fine, and always have been.
Funny story about the 'no cavities' thing - when I was maybe 12 I went to a new dentist who found a cavity in a molar, drilled it out, and filled it with some sort of 'invisible' polymer filling and charged a whole bunch of money for it. Next dentist I went to, I mentioned the cavity and he said nobody had drilled on the tooth and there was no sign of a cavity or a filling of any type there.
Some years later, I was reading somewhere online and found out that the dentist who "filled" the "cavity" was a subscriber to a dental practice management program run by the Church of Scientology that, in part, taught that it was OK to rip off patients who weren't Scientologists. A few years after that, the dentist got arrested for molesting children and is probably still in prison.
I also drink a lot of tea and coffee, and unless I pay extra, I don't get any whitening.
I found that getting the fluoride paste applied at the end of each cleaning actually helps reduce the tea staining. (My teeth used to stain pretty bad)
Some 20 years later I finally went to a dentist again, in a developing country no less, because I had a visible cavity - my first ever. It was quite scary given the elapsed time. $15 dollars, and about as many minutes, later all was said and done, with no other issues present.
Dentists are fucking psychopaths and we are literally cattle at their mercy. I have no idea how to continue, how to find a dentist I can trust with my stupid teeth. I am terribly afraid of them now.
If you are in pain, they either damaged the nerve which is bad as that could require a root canal eventually. Or they failed to clean out the cavity and it's infected. Either way, you should experiment with finding a dentist, perhaps go in for a cleaning every 6 months to check a dentist out.
At not point are you obligated to do a cavity filling unless you are comfortable with it. Just decline any additional services beyond the cleaning.
Also, try oil pulling and get some good higher end toothpaste. I had some sensitivity and after doing both everything is great.
But I went to a new dentist in FL a few months ago, and that guy told me to refill them because according to him, they are starting to crack (not sure how he saw them in grainy X-rays; he tried to show me one, but I couldn't see it) :D Anyway, I agreed to have them refilled since it's been a while and the cost was reasonable. Now one of the fillings he redid in my molar makes me feel uncomfortable when I chew things with it.
I wrote up a more detailed experience about this in another comment in this post. I hope people see it and learn from it to not trust their dentists easily (esp. the ones you are visiting for the first time).
I finally found a good dentist, but it was after I chipped one during the pandemic. It was never was done right in the first place, or the second place when I had it fixed. Lost that tooth unfortunately.
But after ten years with no dentistry, I had only one other cavity, and of course some light gingivitis. They did not have an idea I hadn’t been for over ten years.
I had great insurance at the time, and I was so shocked that I didn’t get a second opinion. After many years of retrospect, I have deep fissures which I got sealed years ago, and I suspect this hack saw shadows and assumed cavity instead of looking, because almost of the cavities she found were in the molars.
If the news is awful always get several opinions. One person may know better ways to handle it.
In medicine you treat the patient, not the picture. If your teeth seem fine, they probably are fine.
You will always hear a lot of differing opinions about this from health care professionals and there are of course exceptions, but exceptions are exceptions. You must keep in mind that HCPs are people that see a disproportionate number of very unwell people and they are not immune to bias.
Because of this bias, a common phrase in medicine is if you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras. It's a way of saying that most symptoms you see will be from ordinary ailments. I can think of too many cases where patients went through needless testing and anxiety only to eventually discover that it was all for nothing.
My new dentist says there is nothing wrong with my teeth whatsoever.
Maybe 10 years later, after countless people warning me that I was gambling with my health by never going to a dentist, I thought I'd try again. I went to the local university dental school, where they need problems to work on.
They told me I was totally fine.
I haven't been to a dentist in the maybe 15 years since that experience. It turns out there is almost no evidence to support routine cleanings or consulting with a dentist.
HN anecdotal data is not medical advice - but if you aren't suffering from any dental issues, it could be worth your time to do some research before you schedule your next dental appointment, and if you get a diagnosis of an issue it might be worth a second opinion. I highly recommend checking to see if your local dental school is taking appointments, because they have no incentive to push additional procedures on you (they can always find somebody who really needs it).
I hadn't been to a dentist in 10 years, not even for a cleaning. I chipped tooth and went in to get it fixed.
The dentist tried to upsell me on a ton of things that needed to be looked at.
Never once mentioned that it looked like I hadn't had a cleaning in a while.
I got my tooth fixed (just a bit of bonding), never had any of the other work he recommended done.
I went to a new dentist a few months ago because I was starting to get some sensitivity and exposure at a gum, which I thought was really bad. He said it wasn't a big deal, fixed it up, but then says he wants to cap all of my teeth!
Happy to be reading this and think I'll wait on getting any more work.
Once I saw a new dentist who also told me I had several cavities. Look, my teeth health isn't perfect, but any dentist that tells me I have so many cavities is a big red flag. I ended up seeing another dentist and that dentist told me I didn't have any cavities. The inconsistency between dentists is really off the charts (per TFA).
Also this quote from the article was telling:
> At a dental school, I heard about a newsletter, The Profitable Dentist, and became a subscriber. From this newsletter, I discovered that there’s a whole business devoted to telling dentists how to build up the “million dollar practice.” Dentists are flocking to courses on how to generate more profits by maximizing the use of hygienists, extending credit, stepping up collection practices, and persuading patients to accept expensive restoration work instead of fillings.
Look for any dentist trying to increase their bottom line: patients are not idiots. If a dentist tries to upsell me aggressively, I simply find another dentist. The reality is there are nearly endless dentists to choose from in my metropolitan area.
I got a second opinion, they fixed my tooth there and then. Been seeing this dentist on and off for ten years with insurance changes. I have had 2 cavities in ten years.
Before I had an appointment with the new dentist, my wife had an appointment, and he told her she had gum disease with bone loss and needed a deep cleaning and to go on a "periodontal schedule" where she would have to come in every three months instead of six. (Note: My wife and I have different last names and separate insurance, so he wouldn't have known we're related.)
When I went in, the hygenist measured my pocket depths, and I noticed she seemed to be adding 1-3mm to what I remembered the measurements being every time I had that done in the past. The dentist then came in and gave me what sounded like a rehearsed speech concluding in the same diagnosis he had given my wife.
I told him I'd like to think about it and could he please send me the records they based this on. They proceeded to rush me out of the office, outright refusing to do the regular cleaning.
I went to another dentist and only told her I left my previous dentist because he gave me bad vibes. She started off with the pocket measurements which were magically back to normal! She said my teeth looked great. Then she asked about my previous dentist and I told her what happened. She said: "I suspected it was something like that."
So... yeah... what an industry...
ETA: Although now in my paranoia I wonder if the new dentist somehow knew the previous dentist's diagnosis and realized the way to keep me as a customer would be to tell me they were wrong. But they shouldn't be able to get my past records unless I authorize it, right?
I don't think it is necessarily done intentionally, but it's good to be a tiny bit skeptical especially when new factors are involved.
I moved cities a few years ago, about an hour south of where I used to live, and I changed my doctor, my mechanic, but I kept my dentist even though it's a 1.5 hour drive in rush hour traffic. It's worth it. There's plenty of dentists around my new house, and I tried one of them and it was awful. I went back to my beloved dentist in the old city and I'll never look for another one. They don't ever try to recommend work I don't need, they find and fix real problems not made-up problems, and the prices are very reasonable.
Once you find a good dentist, keep them forever if you can. It's too bad your old dentist sold the business, that would be devastating for me.
Of course, I now don't want to go back to the new dentist, I want to find a new one that isn't going to screw up the first time they touch me, but that's a minefield too (finding a new dentist). So I've dealt with the pain for like 4 months already.
Sigh.
Did they try to sign you up for a “care” credit card too?
Surely this should be noted in the HN title?
But it still feels relevant. I had a dentist that wanted to drill cavities out with every visit, regardless of how often I flossed and brushed
Been to four dentists since and haven’t been told anything bad at all. There absolutely still exist dentists who are cashing in on us.
> From all dentists, I got a quote of $29,850!
(1997)
as the entire comment. Dang will usually edit the title whenever he notices that.
About 10 years into my career we had already been managing some very large hospital groups but ended up with a mangement contract for a diverse group health system that through accidents of history including some dental clinics. ~50 suites across several sites/brands. I had had some exposure to dental clinics and generally had not been impressed but not overly concerned either.
First meeting we had with the senior staff across the clinics set my hair on fire. It was one of the most callous, fraudulent and shocking things I had ever seen in my career. Dentistry does not have a notion or ethical obligation of "first do no harm...". The entire agenda of the strategy setting meeting was how to trick "patients" into unecessary procedures, generally defraud insurance companies (especially breaking things across many visits that could easily be done in one) and every other deceptive way to inflate profit at "patient" expense that could be conceived. There were quotas for procedures, something unimaginable and defacto illegal in a healthcare setting. Needless to say we divested the dental clinics as soon as possible. I came to find in later years that those modes of operation are more or less commonplace in the industry.
PS: I feel compelled to share her best advice re oral hygiene:
"You only need to floss the teeth you want to keep."
Flossing daily was the single thing that imroved my dental hygiene more than anything else. Brushing, mouthwash, fluoride treatment, gum laser treatment, regular dentist visits, nothing worked. Still had bleeding gum, pain here and there, bad smell, unstopabble tooth decay.
In my mid 20-s I started flossing daily (even multiple times when I feel like food is stuck). Really my mouth problems all went away.
I wish someone had shown me in an earlier age the benefits. I would have saved a lot of my teeth.
Ultimately, whatever you're using, I think the important part is that you're doing it daily, and being thorough.
But I still haven't actually used it for cleaning what it's supposed to. :D
(I can't speak to plaque because I can't really measure it myself. But dentists seem to think I'm flossing quite well now. ha.)
I get so much more food junk out of my teeth with the waterpik. Floss never has and still never does remove much of it - even flossing, mouthwashing, and waiting until morning to try the waterpik consistently finds junk that isn't there if I waterpik. I still keep floss handy for getting truly wedged stuff out (it can provide much more force), but it's worthless for me otherwise.
Start out with a cheap one, and start both gentle and pointed across your teeth, not into your gums. It can be much too harsh when you start out. And very clearly mouths vary a lot, so if it doesn't work, it doesn't work - hence, start cheap.
One thing I wish I learned earlier on in life - flossing isn't to pull out chunks of food from in between the teeth (although it can do this too) - if you're flossing correctly you're breaking up biofilms formed by bacteria at the gumline.
My gums had been bleeding enough during brushing that I decided to break my 14 year run without a dentist visit and get things checked out, but felt shame about the state of things, so I gave myself a month or two of runway - and adopted a daily flossing and mouthwash routine.
By the time I got to the dentist, my gums were in good shape. They removed lot of plaque, but underneath, my teeth were pristine. In the 14 years since I'd been to the dentist, either the tools had become much more humane, or I just happened to be surrounded by sadists in the late 90s/early 2000s.
Upgrading to an electric toothbrush was another revelation, and I also learned that a tongue scraper is the solution to tonsil stones.
Genetics play a part, for sure, but flossing daily has been a total game changer.
My gums were always bad so I thought I needed to floss more. But once I started using an electronic tooth brush all my gum problems are gone.
eg Oral B Glide tests at 248,900 ppm / 25% of volume for PFAS
And if those prices were in 1997 dollars, I can’t imagine they’d be anything but much higher in 2022.
> Your dental work is lousy
This makes me fly away faster than anything else.
> Some of your crowns have jagged edges and need immediate attention. They will trap food and cause decay
I've also heard this one for the first time from a dentist that I thought I could trust. She initially said the previous work was nicely done, but one day, curiously while she started renovation work in her office, this became a problem that "she wasn't comfortable with anymore"
This is to the point that I switch dentists often and only get cleanings, reject everything they propose. Nothing they recommend ever align, and I'm quite open to them about that, and they still go ahead and affirm that the previous one was wrong and they know their shit.
> what I really ought to do, he said, would be to crown all 28 teeth
How can you reasonably be comfortable proposing that to someone? I can't begin to imagine all the problems you're gonna create for your customer at this stage.
Incentives for dentists are built in a way that only a very strong ethical sense will make them do the right thing. And since the standard is so low, of course things are going this way.
Unless ethical boards are made to be more independent and get much stronger on this kind of malpractice, or you reform training so that dentists don't start with huge student debt, there's no good way out.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/05/the-tro...
I notice though that neither my hygenist's or my dentist's office has been handing out information about this approach. Not good for business perhaps. I believe this technique works via abrasion so toothpaste is a must. I use a Braun 4000 but any sturdy electric toothbrush should work.
[1]https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220718-the-best-way-to-....
It's also helpful to have a reliable hygienist check how you're going until you get it right. I'll probably end up going about every six months in any case, with healthy gums. Which is much better than "I would hate to see you lose all your teeth." which is what my hygienist said before I got serious.
Finally, I've only been brush once a day, before bed for two reasons. First to check how well things were going and second, to avoid too much wear and tear on the gums in case it wasn't necessary. As it turned out I'm fine with once a day. The primary way I check between check ups is to floss about once every two weeks. If my gums bleed then it's a sign I'm off track. Before I started this technique my gums would almost always bleed.
Do you mean that your gums were shrinked and then growed back to their full height? Or that they were sore and not anymore?
If dentists want to start drilling, capping, or pulling. Go get a second opinion.
I was referred to the Otho within my dentists office to look at my wisdom teeth. I was not in pain, they weren’t impacted, instead I was told “It’s a standard practice just to check.” It was supposed to be a consultation, but the ortho wanted to rip them out right then and there. He was frustrated at my insistence that we understand the total cost after insurance. I was awake for the procedure, local anesthetic only.
My dentist at the next visit looked at my X-rays and asked why I got my wisdom teeth out. The ortho was no longer with them.
Good riddance
This guy got 50 opinions and 12 of the dentists gave reasonable treatment plans. At least one dentist said there was nothing wrong.
I’m not sure two opinions is enough really.
I'm convinced that regulators should take a look at (ortho)dentists in the US, it's one of the most scammy group of people.
Also, I'm so happy that invisalign is being disrupted by all these online companies like SmileDirectClub/Byte/NewSmile/Candid/etc. It's literally the exact same service but you'll find plenty of FUD online about it. Can't wait for invisalign to die.
It was hard to take the rest of your comment seriously after that, and only reinforces the “europeans have bad teeth” stereotype.
> the authors of these guidelines could not find convincing evidence to support flossing, and the guidelines are supposed to be evidence-based. According to reviews of the evidence published in 2011 and 2015, there is minimal, short-term, and generally unreliable evidence that flossing might reduce gum inflammation, but no convincing evidence that it promotes plaque removal or prevents tooth decay or dental caries (cavities).
Basically, brush your teeth and you'll be fine. Europeans have great teeth, they just care less about having the great white hollywood smile, and care more about having their healthcare cover dental work.
Flossing isn’t some kind of conspiracy. Dentists make no money off it. Many dental associations and government agencies outside of the US recommended it. Dental hygienist can frequently tell when you don’t floss because flossing reduces bleeding gums.
Bleeding gums are correlated with all kinds of poor health outcomes.
Furthermore The proposed mechanism of action for improving gum health is plausible and reasonable. We know that food stuck between teeth leads to gum inflammation—it is very reasonable that removing that food is beneficial.
There is no conclusive peer reviewed evidence that wiping your ass is beneficial either.
It's only when a patient is paying fully out of pocket when a dentist would perhaps have an easier time getting a way with over-diagnosing. Even then, they can still get in trouble with the ADA since that treads closely with medical fraud.
As is the case in many parts of the healthcare industry in the US (and many other countries), for practitioners who don't care as much about the ethics of it, they'll tread as closely as they can without crossing over into outright fraud.
And this conspiracy has infiltrated not only the ADA and every dental schools but dental hygienist schools and dental agencies all over the world.
Dentists are all remarkably consistent about flossing. This level of coordination would require an actual coordinated conspiracy that is massive in scale.
I would argue that flossing is even more important than brushing teeth, since the food particles stuck between teeth are more likely to stick around and feed the bacteria that cause cavities and bad breath.
Said someone who probably never travelled in Europe
I'm 60 years old. Up until about 25 I just listened to dentists. They drill-and-fill and I went along. No longer. In 35 years I've had one problem. I broke a tooth biting on a hard seed in some Indian food. I got a crown for that. A few years later the crown came off. I haven't bothered getting it replaced.
I don't have tooth pain. My teeth have not shifted. I still eat what I want. I'm careful with Indian food. :)
My takeaway? I'm not seeing the dentist until I'm in pain or something breaks. No one is drilling on X-ray shadows again.
There are studies that link gum disease to dementia.
https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/large-study-links-gum-disease-d...
> The mouth is home to about 700 species of bacteria, including those that can cause periodontal (gum) disease. A recent analysis led by NIA scientists suggests that bacteria that cause gum disease are also associated with the development of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, especially vascular dementia. The results were reported in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Going to the dentist for cleaning may be a good thing for those with less than ideal dental hygiene habits - even if no suggestions of cavities are ever drilled.
In short, I'd do it differently if I were doing it again. But I certainly would never take it to the level that most people do.
And you know this from any other sources than the dentist you then paid to fix it?
What ended up happening was that both returns were so dramatically different, along many different dimensions. It took me nearly 40 hours to catalog all the different decisions made by each preparer, and which of the two decisions is the better one. Through this exercise, I realized that both preparers had made some major errors - and by reconciling them, I ended up saving more than $10,000, while also making my tax returns more resilient if audited.
I'm convinced that for any non-trivial decision in any field, the best way to make them is to hire multiple independent professionals, and cross-check their independent recommendations. And yes, this applies to software engineers as well.
I decided to trust my instincts (weird pushy vibe from the dentist) and wait. Eight months later, I started seeing a new dentist who performed a full set of X-rays and new patient scans. They found that my teeth were in good shape and made no mention of needing a root canal. The sensitivity I had initially experienced had also completely vanished.
The entire ordeal led me to view dentistry in a new light. It reminded me that in many specialized trades, you're often at the mercy of the professionals in that field. Whether it's a dentist or any other specialist, there's always the risk that their profit motive might influence their advice or actions. Finding trustworthy specialists of any kind is tricky; more so when the economy is faltering.
I'm convinced dentistry is a total scam. I'm the only person in my friends group that has never had a cavity or dental work, and I strongly suspect it's not because there's anything special about me, except that I don't go to dentists as often as most people do.
I had stellar dentists up until I moved to a new city and had my first experience with a bad dentist. Never again.
Now I'm old enough to know better and here's my advice: brush and floss once a day before bed. Don't eat anything after you do so. If you want to get rid of "morning mouth", rinse your mouth using diluted hydrogen peroxide. Put a very gentle amount of pressure on the teeth using the brush. You don't need to scrub them.
If you can get a descaling from a dentist, take advantage of it. Ask the hygienist to use a local numbing agent on your teeth before cleaning (the gel not the injection). They'll know what this is. It makes the descaling far less painful and sort of pleasant.
When it comes to procedures like crowns or wisdom teeth, only deal with it if there is pain. I had my wisdom teeth removed and I disagree that it was medically necessary. They would have come in normally.
And if you know a medical professional, ask them who their doctor is and then ask that doctor who their dentist/doctor/eye doctor/etc is. Go to the medical professional other medical professionals go to if your insurance allows for it.
Good luck fellow HN friends.
Is the only way to determine a bad dentist by going to many? I am in need of lots of work, but the thought of going to a ton of car-salesman-esque "medical professionals" to pick the correct one .. is terrifying.
Be wary of pushy dentists that are unwilling to treat you unless you agree to their “plan”. I once was told by a dentist as a new patient that they would not perform a standard cleaning until they could do a more extensive, more expensive, not covered by insurance cleaning. Immediately left that office and found another dentist. Turns out I did not need that cleaning.
Side Story: in my home country, Argentina, you can get national or imported screws/implants. The difference for doing one over the other is like 3 times. So let's say 500 dollars vs 1500 dollars (those are not the actual number), but I am friendish with a dentist, and he told me that the actual difference between a national vs imported screen is no more than 50 dollars.
The real problem is that dentists business model assumes they will do a lot of restorative work but people’s dental health has improved so it’s far less necessary than before.
Also, I do a tooth cleaning, 1 hour work, 100 euros. I do an implant, also 3 hours of work. 1800 euros. What is the reason?
Wouldn't make more sense to do 10 implants at 800 than do 1 or 2 at 1800? I don't get it.
One of the dentists I used to go told me that he was no longer doing implants because people won't pay for them. Of course!
If it is a full minimum salary for 3/6 hour of work. Charge something reasonable and people would do it.
We are in 2023, a dental implant can no longer be considered a luxury. It is crazy.
If you read into the history, it's because the doctors of the past didn't consider dentistry to be a real field (basically considered it more cosmetic), so the early pioneers of dentistry profession formed their own club.
And now that there's so much money in keeping the peasant bloodsucking machine known as healthcare going in the US, nobody is going to alter it to even include dentistry. For fear of losing out money.
My insurance sucks but at least it’s useful that insurance considers optional what my dentist says is essential. For example, my dentist only does tooth colored fillings and my insurance doesn’t cover them. My dentist says the covered ones are unsafe.
It’s a weird situation. My last dentist said I needed an “emergency crown” because my tooth would shatter at any moment. It was $3000. My insurance covered $600. The dentist said it was because my insurance was terrible.
Another dentist said the crown was optional and would cost $1800. That’s almost a 100% price difference.
And my most recent dentist says I don’t need a crown at all and it’s been two years since the “emergency.”
I’m not sure what’s going on, but of course it’s impossible to compare prices when choosing dentists and I don’t trust new dentists at all.
My issue is that one dentist thought it was an emergency and it obviously isn’t. It’s not the optionality, it’s that one said it was not optional.
And that one dentist charged $3000 and one $1800. And they don’t have options. That is the only price they charge.
We all go to the dentist every 6 months, let them do whatever they need to do (a good cleaning every visit, X-Ray every two years), etc. And it doesn't cost a lot.
(Western Europe)
The problem is that if dentis technicians speak up against a dentist, it usually means they lose a customer. Dentists will find someone else to fill their order. It's basically a mafia.
This happens in other fields as well, such as: shoving expensive pills down depressed teens throats to milk insurance money, then gain power of attorney over said kid to feed him 16 pills instead of one (true story, friend's son, named Bobby, would have otherwise recovered naturally, but is simply not himself anymore).
Here are a few problems:
* Money inventivizes immortal practices. Bigger (albeit unnecessary) procedure with lifetime consequences, but more insurance money. Or just money if you don't have insurance.
* The craft is polluted by bad role models. Normalizing said practices, effectively absolving young professionals from accountability.
* Flawed definition of good mentorship. Young Professionals need mentors that are a figurative handrail to honesty, and acceptance of feedback from peers. i.e. when dentists get remarks from dentist technicians that said procedure is unnecessary.
I started having incredible tooth ache, so I found dentist clinic and went there. I had no insurance or anything.
After being quite impressed with the facility, the dentist came and started testing my teeth at the back. He was putting small swab with cold water, but he didn't find it. He told me that there should be root canal, and that I should look for a good dentist to do it for me. I was going to New York on my way back to Poland, and he mentioned that New York have best dentists and that root canal can cost around $2000 there.
It would be cheaper for me to fly back Poland, have a root canal done there and back btw.
Eventually he prescribed me antybiotic which helped. I payed $150 for the visit (down from $250 because I was foreigner I guess?).
Long story short after 2 weeks I went to the dentist in Poland. He did the same thing with cold swab, but this time he touched on the side which I immediately noticed. Dentist in the US touched only from the top, he didn't even bother to touch on the side.
It was root canal indeed and was fixed in 1 visit for $200.
I know of a few people that just fly to Puerto Vallarta, have a vacation in a nice 5 star hotel, get multiple days worth of dental work done and then fly back. All for less money than a single dental visit in the US and equal or better care.
Whilst extracting my last wisdom tooth (in the US) the dentist must have made a bad mistake, because right after the procedure I couldn't bite down properly on the affected side on my mouth.
I went for years with this situation, and started experiencing occasional pain on that side. Whilst a teaching assistant the the University of Washington (UW), I used to visit UW Medicine for faculty, telling the dentists that I suspected a fracture (based on my research). However they would invariably just throw me off, claiming it was very hard to identify such cracks, it might not actually be a crack, etc.
Eventually I lost that tooth, almost certainly due to the widening crack, as I suspected.
Now back home in Ghana, another tooth seems weak when eating certain very hard foods, and again I suspect a crack. Again, dentists in general seem unwilling to really address it, halfheartedly trying various diagnostic procedures that do not actually uncover the problem.
One was quick to propose a root canal, which seemed weird to me as the first line option to address something like that. This dentist describes himself as a root-canal specialist, and it's not a stretch to assume that he sees every dental problem in terms of root canals. Another dentist suggested it was a small cavity, and did her drill and fill routine, which has done nothing at all to alleviate the problem. Yest another dentist claims I need some tooth tissue filed away to correct the problem.
So now I'm not sure what to do. It seems cracks are hard to identify; I'm not sure why dental imaging cannot help much here. I'd like to know if there are better options than dealing with lazy dentists who just want your money.
I had a tooth pulled. Could have been a root canal, but whatever. (Insert sob story)
The real problem was that this dentistry was quietly affiliated to the local university's dental school. Many of the students end up here. The problem, is that the dentistry IS NOT UPFRONT this is a teaching business, and not actual professionals.
I found it out when I was digging through unrelated records in GIS, and found they were legally registered as a school. Dug deeper, and they're basically misrepresenting and lying to the public.
So yeah, keep this scam in mind as well. (I call it a scam cause I wasn't getting student rates, and they did their damndest to hide that.)
Many dentists are criminals willing to drill holes in children's teeth in order fraudulently take your money.
She's now 15. Never had a cavity ever.
Whats expensive is the nitrox oxide which the kids require because they can't sit still. Or maybe the dentist isn't good at her job and can't do it without it. This is 100% out of pocket. Insurance doesn't cover it. and the dentist can set whatever the price they want. This costs $100.
The kids for sure, fight and the dentist is in there trying to get them to open their mouth. Well, my youngest had 5 cavities, and only 2 got filled because of her small mouth and not comfortable.
You know what that means...more money to shell out because now she needs sedation. And that's $400, for a little drink that's like "Benadryl" as the dentist said...and it barely worked. The last filling couldn't be filled.
If we were more knowledgeable we would have just given her melatonin before the first procedure as that's more effective in calming her.
Oh and I found out the dentist is closed on Fridays. Must be nice to be able to charge so much you can pay yourself, staff the needed salaries and only work 4 days.
There may be stereotypes about the British having bad teeth, but I've never had a dentist try to milk my wallet like that despite a poor diet having done a fair bit of damage over the years.
Dentistry here seems much more about doing the minimum necessary work to save teeth and relieve pain. The thought of getting crowns done en-masse is terrifying, I've only had one done, and it wasn't a fun experience - it's something I see as a last resort to save a tooth, certainly not something I'd want to go through for cosmetic improvements.
What was "unfun" about it? I'm familiar with what they are, but not the pain-points (in the non-literal sense lol) of getting them.
Once they begin, I believe you’re pretty much stuck there until the dentist is done, and that’s a lot of drilling.
Not looking forward to ever needing anything like that.
But the tooth had had a root canal done some years before the crown, so there was no nerve to cause pain when/after much of the tooth was drilled away to prepare for the crown. Not sure what the process is if the tooth is healthier/more sensitive to begin with.
End result is good though. Just not something I'd choose to go through it if was mostly cosmetic rather than to save a tooth.
Unfortunately I had a ligament tear in my knee and after 4 surgeries I developed some pretty bad pains.
I took a vacation and scheduled visits to 10 orthopedic surgeons who had some of the highest medical credentials in the country.
Everyone told me that pain was caused by a different thing and dismissed ideas of other doctors.
The confidence with which they told me the reason would have convinced me have I not visited other doctors.
Later I had similar experience with doctors from other health areas.
Essentially, in medicine they can only diagnose the most typical stuff, for anything else it's just a bunch of wild guesses.
Also, they just discovered a new ligament in the knee a few years ago. Orthopedic science is not where a layman would imagine it to be.
Took a few years and about 50 of PRP and hyaluronic acid injections inside the knee joint, one SVF procedure (probably the most efficient thing), and regular muscle strengtening.
MRI shows that missing cartilage in my knee has grown back.
Funny thing, if you Google right now "can cartilage in the knee grow back?" you are going to get a "NO" except for some experimental treatments.
I've had similar experiences that make me never want to go to a dentist again because these new practices are so detached from reality. They only care about what is covered by your insurance and will deceive you with non-answers to maximize it.
I've also had experiences where one dentist will tell me I have a cavity and I'll get it checked out by another dentist who cannot confirm. These types of things need some type of tally from the public so others don't let these money-grabbers get off scot free.
This article is right on the money.
The first one to recommend this was 35 years ago.
I still have them, and the last dentist I saw says they are in good shape. The first one ever to tell me this. I've never had an issue with them.
Go figure.
The dentist said I really needed to have the other three removed also. I can't remember why exactly they claimed I needed to do that. But it ballooned the cost up well over $1000 (maybe $1500, don't remember). When I said no the second time, they had the very pretty receptionist (/model?) come into the room and sit right next time me and explain again why I needed to have them out.
All told, I had to explain at least three times how I was definitely too broke to consider removing the other teeth. They didn't believe me and even asked again what my job was or something (was a low-paying job).
The other wisdom teeth never caused a problem like that one I had removed. Or any other problem that I am aware of. I actually haven't been to the dentist since. Not aware of any teeth falling out or anything obvious like pain. I think it would be good to get them cleaned one of these days though.
I've internalised that little experiment as my "acid test of scientific maturity".
A random example that passes with flying colours is Chemistry: the exact same periodic table is taught in every school in every country. Nobody debates the existence of benzene, or the ability of acids to dissolve metals. There is no "eastern school" competing with the "orthodoxy of the south" or whatever. There is only one chemistry, globally.
A lot of other supposedly "highly scientific" fields fail this test. For example, there was a survey of practising theoretical physicists about the foundations of quantum mechanics, and it turned out that they disagreed on everything. Meanwhile they were all individually convinced that there is consensus, and that they're in agreement with it.
- shower curtains instead of glass doors: subpar airbnb
- Kikkoman soy sauce: probably not the best sushi
- teeth whitening services: dentist not optimizing for dental health
The problem is that they all push teeth whitening ... but it's a strong signal if you find one that doesn't.
means they're charging you enough for both in the fees.
The inept guy generates business by doing such a poor job with fillings that crowns and root canals are always eventually needed. And he does such a poor job with those that bridges and implants are then needed. He's a master bullshitter and most patients trust him (a few catch on, and a few have sued). My friend keeps records for the lawsuits, covers her own butt, and discreetly encourages some patients to go elsewhere.
The fraudster puts everyone on "perio" schedules (cleanings every 3 months instead of 6) whether they need it or not. And also bills insurance for treatment he didn't do. His actual dental skills are decent, however.
We laypeople assume we can trust these "experts" with degrees and white coats when we really have no clue if what they're doing is legit.
Next time you get your teeth cleaned, ask the hygienist if they themselves (or their family -- kids, parents) use the dentist you're about to see. My friends says that this is the question with the most valuable answer. She wouldn't let either guy within 100 miles of her teeth or her kids' and will happily tell people where she goes if they ask.
This is assuming the hygienist isn't crooked too. In the US, hygienists are typically paid hourly but with "production" bonuses, meaning they get a cut of the dentists fees for treatment beyond cleaning. So beware that they're incentivized to do more treatment than necessary too. In my friend's case, the bonuses are a small %, so it's not a huge incentive.
She stays because they pay well, give her the hours she needs as a single mom, and likes her co-workers. But the patient care and outcomes do take moral toll on her.
In my experience, and in my own opinion, the industry of dentistry would be nowhere near as necessary as it currently is if people largely gave up consuming too much carbohydrates and sugar, which feed the bacteria that are ultimately the root cause of tooth decay. Acidification of saliva is of course an issue as well, but I think the whole "drinking cola will rot your teeth" thing is an exaggeration and a sort of red herring. It's not the soda per se, or so much the acidity of carbonated water, but the fact that you're feeding bacteria which colonize in the crevices and pores of your teeth, forming biofilm, creating isolated pockets of acid that wear holes in teeth. If it was all about exogenous acid, then the entire tooth would be rotting evenly, but that's usually not what you see.
My teeth aren't perfect. In fact, there's some decay that I've let sit there for nearly two decades now. Ever since I cut sugar from my regular diet, any caries I had either reversed (when extremely early) or stopped progressing. I do plan on seeing a dentist soon to actually address the decay, because it's silly to leave it there, but I'm confident that I otherwise stopped it in its tracks. My gums don't bleed, and I've seen no meaningful changes to my teeth in all that time. If my hypothesis is correct, then there's a real conundrum because the most affordable food available to people also tends to promote more tooth decay; dentistry largely exists to compensate for the fact that the cheapest available energy for humans comes with negative side effects.
I just switched dentists last week. One cavity and they want to fix an old crown.
I never had one of those teeth pulled.
- Vitamins K2 and D3 halted further decay it seems. For a few years I took only those and things plateaued mostly (but not entirely).
- Chewable digestive enzymes - not much research on this, but eg bromelain destroys biofilm, exposing pathogens to other interventions. This eliminated sensitive gums and remaining pains quickly for me.
- Oral probiotic chewables (Salivarius K12) every now and then reduced the occasional pain in root canals. I also slept better, probably because they reduced throat swelling too.
- Intranasal pathogen interventions (nasal rinse with NAC, tea tree oil etc) and L. Sakei colonization were actually meant to improve nasal breathing (they did), but also helped oral health.
- Organic silica (liquid MMST in my case, but chOSA should work too) - has made my enamel look more solid.
- Tooth paste (chewable actually) containing baking soda, reducing acidity. This helped reduce pain greatly when one of the root canals got inflamed.
Oh and really do take care of inflamed root canals. Those are a major health risk. Look into getting the roots cut off and sealed - it’s gruesome but could save the tooth with relatively low cost.
I don’t think this is a function of medicine but a function of poor ethics in dentistry.
I'm sure any profession that it takes years of training to practice probably comes with enough complexity that broad consensus becomes generally unachievable.
Moved to the US in the early 90s, the dental practice in the US, holy moly! TVs with cartoons mounted to the ceiling, a bunch of staff from office workers dealing with insurance and scheduling to dental assistants. Then 1 or 2 dentist moving from patient to patient sequentially. It was a business first.
I don't know what it's like in France now, this was in the north, in a traditionally not affluent area (though my family was by all standards affluent). Has it become more like the US now? I don't which one is best, I do know all my grandparents (who were not affluent) had full dentures by the time they were 60.
Dentist cleanings are to remove tartar buildup, which even if it was a thing you may not have needed (depends on diet and how good you are at cleaning your own teeth).
I found a new dentist for my next cleaning 6 months later and got my usual teeth look great, no problems, see you in six months. That whole experience does not foster feelings of trust toward the profession, to say the least.
THE SAME THING HAPPENED TO ME!
I went to a dentists office that I found on ZocDoc for a routine cleaning. They took lots of X-rays, etc. The dentist told me that I grind my teeth and needed a night guard. Never heard this before up until that point.
A few years later, I went to get another cleaning. This dentist never mentioned the grinding, despite having taken a bunch of X-Rays...
Also, Can anyone tell why don't more people fly to other countries for these procedures? Paying something like 6k$ for a crown is pure extortion. In India, a decent one (with quality equivalent to US) costs around 60$. That a difference of 100x.
It's a lot easier when you have family and referrals in the other country who can point you at a trusted source.
Just like most outsourcing, I suppose.
Asking friends for recommendations is the best approach I've found - are there others?
I am excited to see an article using AP style. Maybe it's because it's from 1997, back when there were copy editors.
I had another one tell me I had a 'dead' tooth and it needed extraction as it would rot my mouth. I saw a different dentist and I asked about my 'dead' tooth. They responded I had no dead teeth and weren't sure what I was referring to.
Another anecdote: My child's teeth were coming in crooked, and had some late adult teeth. The first orthodontist suggested a spreader (a common procedure where your palate is split and made wider), followed by braces. The second said that they could also suggest an alternative, with only braces.
End result-- the dentists that give options are the better ones (IMO). If they give only one option, I am cautious. In general, get a second opinion.
Despite the fact that I haven't changed my dental practices in as long as I can remember I get told different things every time I go. One time they tell me I need to be better about brushing, next time I need to floss more. Most recently, again I haven't changed my habits at all, they said I'm doing a great job and shouldn't change my practices at all.
I felt like my dentist was morally upstanding.
Maybe the legal system that makes journalists afraid to name and shame clearly dangerous dentists is part of the problem?
Not exactly: my premiums go up and care goes down because of the insane gouging.
Then I tell them I'll just buy a few $50 pair on Zenni and they get wildly aggressive. Sorry, been wearing Zenni for a long time, they're excellent.
Anyone have links to good studies (or even RCTs) about flossing, different kinds of toothpaste, etc.?
I don't wanna open up the whole fluoride debate, but it seems _stannous_ fluoride is more effective than _sodium_ fluoride. The mouthwash I bought stained my teeth (can't find the link, but you had to dilute it with water. Something like [0]).
I remember reading a study that pulling wisdom teeth was unnecessarily common. I can attest that, as the best dentist actually compared two X-rays six months apart to see whether they moved.
P.S. Castle Dental is the worst. They quoted me for almost $3k worth of work! A second opinion told me I just needed a cleaning and maybe a filling.
[0]: https://www.amazon.com/3M-ESPE-PerioMed-Stannous-Concentrate...
* Brush teeth morning and night with any name brand fluoride toothpaste, replacing toothbrush often like every 6 months
* Use a floss pick morning and night, and preferably on any gum pockets after meals, since cavities form where the tartar is, where the food sits, which can be revealed by using disclosing tablets periodically
* Use a water pick morning and night
* Get fluoride treatments from the dentist every 6 months until adulthood, after that is too late except as maintenance, but continue that schedule for checkups
* Sleep with mouth closed at night using nasal strips and optionally taping mouth in an x-shape to not stretch philtrum, because dry mouth causes gum disease
* Avoid sugar and foods like potato chips which stick to roots and cause tartar, or brush afterwards
* Drink milk until adulthood and continue until intolerant, also eat leafy green vegetables and other high-calcium foods
* Eat whole fresh firm foods which develop the jaw and teeth, especially in youth while still growing
* Exercise, especially weights and athletic movements that exercise the face and jaw to promote development and encourage blood flow
* Work on head/neck posture and sit upright in chair while working, since mouth breathing is caused by poor posture that narrows the throat's air supply, which causes dry mouth which leads to bad breath and tooth decay
* Don't smoke and avoid excessive alcohol
* Consider orthodontic treatment if bite is off, since once enamel is worn, it takes too long to redeposit before the tooth wears to the point of failure, but get multiple opinions and avoid all extractive dental work and/or headgear, since orofacial myofunctional exercises accomplish the same thing and can have better long-term results
I hear though that a lot of dentists get into scams like Amway and Scientology.
Tooth decay is a slow process and the treatments slowly ramp up in invasiveness: when it's minor you can use sealant (like painting over it), if it progresses you get a filling (with some minor drilling), if that progresses you get a root canal (drilling out the whole nerve and replacing the bulk of the tooth). You may only reach the threshold of feeling pain at the point of needing a root canal when it can be preventable earlier.
(I do suspect hygienists are capable of spotting most of this but my impression is they're not licensed to diagnose.)
As an interesting extra they dressed him up in high and low socioeconomic status clothes (jeans, t-shirt and backpack vs. suit with Rolex and car keys) and found the "student" was 'overtreated' more than the business man. The assumption was that richer patients are more likely to get a second opinion, and thus the dentists didn't make up problems.
[1] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036573
Guess what, the tooth healed up and stopped hurting and stopped wiggling in there. that was about 10 years ago, and it's been fine ever since. Now, I use the water pick 3 times a day and brush at least the same number of times or more. And I have not been back to the dentist since. I just keep everything nice and clean in there. I am not a doctor and blah blah warning. Just my personal experience.
Chiropractor == Dentist (IMHO)
> This article originally ran in the February 1997 issue of Reader’s Digest.
> [Stock photo of people shaking hands]
> Originally Published: November 18, 2020
Is the 1997 date a printed issue and the 2020 date an online posting? Weird. Either way it's very old. It would be nice to know if the situation is as bad now as what was portrayed in the article.
My own opinion: their arrogance is the most offensive part of the situation. There are plenty of great doctors and surgeons out there, don’t get me wrong. But the majority seem to think they are a superior species.
My story: I brush and floss every single day. At my regular checkup, the dentist measured 2-5mm gum depths, and insisted on doing a deep cleaning, which involves anesthesia and multiple visits. I argued that the 5mm depths were borderline, and could very well be 4mm with measurement error. (They did seem to be pushing rather hard.) They also pointed out some tiny supposed "pockets" on the X-ray that looked like just imaging blur or something. Feeling very suspicious, I left, and found another dentist with, surprisingly, zero bad reviews on Yelp. They measured 2-4mm gum depths, and did a much less aggressive cleaning.
The sooner they’re replaced by automation that’s far superior in terms of accuracy and diagnosis, the better.
Just a hundred years ago doctors were doing wack shit like chopping off limbs and giving people toxins or cocaine. Maybe the cocaine isn’t so bad.
Today they give us SSRIs and opioids.
They are given far too much credit imo when they’re just mechanics. Just like you can get into an accident because brakes failed or something and you’re left with pain and suffering or you die.
I’ve had a misdiagnosis before. It has left me with continued pain and I do thank the second doctor who realized the former doctors mistake and did his best to make me as whole as possible.
I don’t trust doctors. And I don’t think that highly of them either.
I assume you are not referring to the procedural specialties of medicine. My spouse does complex aortic surgery; I don’t think most of her patients would consent to seeing her replaced by a robot. But who knows, techno-dystopias have a strange appeal for some.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iatrogenesis is absolutely a thing and is likely how many of these industries work. The excess activity causes more problems for others to solve.
During each monthly visit, the dentist evaluates my progress by conducting scans (done by the intern) and occasionally cleaning my teeth. The process was quite straightforward, and appears to be much simpler compared to making adjustments for traditional braces.
I'm interested in finding real cost for Invisalign trays and what share get the dentist
But the first dentist I talked to wanted to do some kind of ceramic, and didn't even suggest gold. The second one, I said I wanted gold, and he seemed relieved, saying that was the far better choice, but that he basically never brings it up any more because it has gone out of style.
...it really bothers me that neither of them would have mentioned the safer, superior, more durable option even as just that, an option. :-X
I wonder if this might be an interesting litmus test.
"By the end, the dentists had recommended treatments covering 19 different teeth, ranging from nighttime mouth guards to veneers promising a "complete smile makeover," with cost estimates ranging from $144 to $11,931."
When they asked for answers they were told "Dentistry is more of an art than a science". I damn near fell out of my chair when I heard that.
[1]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dentists-vary-widely-on-diagn...
Top of my crown cracked and I went to a new dentist(because we recently moved) to check it out. They told me that I need to get an implant and that implants are much better than real teeth anyway and it would only cost me $6k. The crazy part is they also had a foot massage place inside the office that was free after your procedure and you also get a free fresh cut rose when you come in...weird.
Anyway, so I went to a different place for a second opinion and they told me the crack is superficial and unless I'm concerned with the way it looks I can just ignore it. Which I did. This was about 3 years ago and I've been going to the second dentist ever since.
A very generous interpretation of the results here are that none of these dentists have a good context for the reporter’s overall dental health, hence such variation, but I suspect it is the far more banal profiteering that is driving the differences.
My own experiences mirror this when I go to a dentist. A gleaming office with several very expensive cars parked out front makes me immediately suspicious.
This industry had better tighten up or it’s going to have real problems with trust.
Actually, the article already identified the prime protection mechanism -- insurance. The data in the article is nearly meaningless, because in each case it was presented as "I will get reimbursed for whatever you charge me".
Having said that, you also need to get quality insurance, not the kind that limits you to the local "Smiles" dental franchise office.
When would dental insurance actually be cost effective for any major operations?
I recently went through a transition from employer-provided group dental insurance, to the basic Medicare Advantage dental offered through Kaiser, and had to pay out of pocket for some major work that couldn't wait (root canal). Since then I have found an affiliation-based group plan that costs a little more but results in much lower amounts charged by the dentist for non-routine work. The quality of the dentists in the network is much higher, in my limited experience.
After he retired the new dentist who bought the practice had no end of things she wanted to do. I have a new crown or two and new fillings. What really got to me is that she kept wanting to put me in braces. I'm 67. I said no once, twice, thrice.
After that I found a new dentist who was a colleague of my old dentist. No unnecessary work!! I'm glad I left that practice.
Visited several dentists recently, all gave me different diagnosis and recommendations. My mother also visited four dentists recently, all gave her different recommendations.
When I say different, there is overlap between them. But also a significant difference.
That's not only dentists. I have several examples in my family when non-dentist doctors give directly opposite opinions.
Also a well known fact: surgeons always recommend to cut.
Yes, doctors are just technicians trying to fix your body. In your It career how many lousy technicians have you met? This is exactly the same, but it's your life, or the quality of it on the line. Remember it next time you get "a diagnosis" and you have this little voice of doubt in your head "hmm, that seems weird".
Like someone else mentioned on here, I’m disinclined to believe in conspiracy theories, but I do believe there is a massive amount of incompetence and irreproducibility in the practice of medicine. It’s not rigorous science by any stretch.
I hadn't been to the dentist since covid. My gf convinced me to try her dentist -- I left with a $6000 proposal to fix all sorts of problems (including the one that sent me there -- a lost filling).
So I went back to my old dentist; she identified the missing filling and a couple of holes "worth keeping an eye on" with a total projected cost of... $300.
He said he was going to drill it out and fill it.
I told him I would schedule another appointment later to get this done….
Fast forward to three weeks ago I go to new dentist… I am 45 and have no cavities .. (never had one in my life am lucky :)
So dentist three years ago was prepared to drill a hole into my tooth and fill it with metal because it “looked like a cavity may be forming”
O
They should be consulting a formal decision tree based on latest research, but many doctors consider that to be insulting, much like they pushed back on check lists when they first became a thing.
Because it's not a science at all as far as going to these dental clinics goes. It's a business.
With him, I pay a 50% premium on the regular dentistry, well above what insurance will pay. Worth it, but makes sense.
I googled trying to find it and pulled up a bunch of other stories of dentists performing unnecessary procedures on children to defraud medicaid.
F'ing monsters.
If you take a human into the healthcare system, there is no upper limit.
I think that’s probably even worse.
WTH?
I'm done all kinds of exams you can think of and it was just me pushing my teeth all the time.
Also post Covid a new dentist said I had built up 6 cavities, so I went somewhere else and they said it was maybe 1 but that if I did fluoride rinse it might just heal over the next year.
That's quite beautiful
„This article originally ran in the February 1997 issue of Reader’s Digest.“
Healthcare in US is robbery in daylight. It’s kind of a joke they call it a capitalist country. Can’t compare prices, get 5 different bills over 6 months, in-network / out-network voodoo. A dentist/doctor could be in-network and yet insurance pays only $10 out of $500 bill and still charges $600/month premium.
The whole industry needs a big refactor.
This article originally ran in the February 1997 issue of Reader’s Digest.
I can only say, avoid dental chains at all costs and only go to trusted dentist owned clinics if possible.
I'm from EU and I got a yearly review + professional cleaning in a chain for my first job more than 15 years ago. The first time I used it they diagnosed me 4 or 5 caries that needed treatment, they said it was just a "beginning" but that it should be treated soon.
I ignored it and left it untreated for 1 year. My family never had problems with caries and before that time I was going to a public dentist who never identified any problem.
Next year I used the professional cleaning again but I went to a different clinic. They identified again 4 caries but in completely different teeth! Since that day I don-t trust any dentist that need an insurance to get patients or is managed by a profit-oriented chain. Note that in my country a lot of dentists don't work with insurance but that might not be the case in other places.
It's not like the dentists shouldn't earn good money, but they the ones that have their own clinic earn more than enough to not have to scam their patients. And even these can be greedy, but at least they are not pushed by a manager with monthly goals, so the chances are lower.
Fast-forward I met my now wife who is actually a dentist. 10 years later after my fake 5 caries she didn't find any.
When she finished her studies, she had to work for a few chains as well. What she saw there is terrifying.
The 1st job she was fired after 4 days because she was asking for autoclave sterilized material for every patient. First they tried to push back saying that ultrasound and chemical was enough, but she was having any of it.
Later the same week, she had a family with 3 kids, and she also requested sterilized tools for each of the 5 patients. They were telling her that sharing tools with the same family is totally fine. She was ready to leave the job the next day but they were faster and fired her. I guess she was starting to raise ideas to the young assistants.
After that she still worked in a few more places before she could find the right family owned clinic first and later start her own clinic.
During this period, she saw multiple malpractices and the authorities are not checking anything until somebody is badly hurt: Non-graduated dentists doing full-licensed dentist procedures, low quality materials and tools from Aliexpress that shouldn't be used for any medical procedure, patients coming from other clinics where after checking the history of x-rays she could see the dentist "planted" the root canal treatment (difficult to 100% proof of course), dentists invoicing for things that they didn't really do, and the list goes on...
Just please, be very careful when choosing your dentist. Some people can save tons of money and a lot of teeth if they have a knowledgeable and honest dentist.
Anyway read my profile and get in touch with me.
He then told me I need to extract a wisdom tooth that never came out. I saw the X-rays and it is not touching/hitting other molar like some of the nightmare wisdom scenarios that I've seen on the internet. It just didn't come out of the gum and it wasn't hurting me for the last 20 years of my life. So I refused saying because it never give me a problem, I'll leave it at that. My worry was that once it's taken out, it would give more space for the molar and other teeth nearby to start shifting, and my teeth spacing will become sparse (thereby, needing Invasilign for real). Then he started talking to me impatiently.
Finally, he suggested I redo the fillings, 4 of them total, that I had done ~10 years ago in SF. I never had any discomfort and there is no stain or sign of old-age in these fillings. The dentist didn't show me any picture of these fillings and why they need to refilled. But given that I have read about fillings needing to be redone every decade or so before, I said alright. Then he did it in 20 mins. Now one of the molars that he refilled has been giving me some uncomfortable sensations occasionally when I chew something with it.
This is not to mention that because I mentioned that the last time I went to a dentist was 1 year ago (I was busy from moving to FL), they suggested me to a deep cleaning. Turns out, that deep cleaning was quoted to be $2592 on paper and cost me $237.80 out of pocket (plus $569.20 paid out by my dental plan). The fillings cost $384 on paper and $36 out of pocket (plus $225 paid out by my dental plan). The worst was that the "deep cleaning" they gave me was EXACTLY the same that I got every six months from my NY dentist, who I had been seeing for 4-5 years.
Basically, my conclusion is that the dentist and hygienists decided to extract (pun intended) as much money out of me as possible because it was my first visit and my teeth are in good condition, so they realize if they couldn't scare me with mis-aligned teeth, closeted wisdom teeth, etc. then they might as well make up some excuses to charge me as much money as possible for "deep cleaning" and refillings. The clinic still made $237.80+$569.20+$36+$225=$1068 for a total of maybe 20 mins with the dentist and 25-30 mins with the hygienist.
Needless to say that I refused to schedule bi-annual (every 6 months) visit with them this July. The point I'm trying to make is that in this day and age of profit-oriented healthcare, we, as patients, cannot trust doctors and dentists without questioning (yet, some doctors and dentists don't like us questioning their judgment/recommendations because they are the ultimate authorities).