> and still no concern about toxicity
The medical experts are still pushing folic acid and folates, and yet it becomes formaldehyde in the body, and formaldehyde was found in tobacco and thought to be one of the causes of lung cancer, and many mothers know the dangers of consuming too much folic acid during pregnancy, like impaired fetal growth, asthma and autism.
So can we really trust the experts including govts and the WHO?
But folic acid can keep anthrax at bay, so are smokers managing inhaled anthrax spores?
In my opinion, one of the reasons why covid was released on the planet was to stimulate interest and growth for the PCR tests. Its useful for detecting pathogens in the body.
They have been using PCR tests in the US to detect drug resistant nematodes (worms) in dogs for at least a decade now, and yet here in the UK, there appears to be nothing of the sort, according to Defra. Surprising how some first world countries appear so backwards in some areas. Not saying there are no pcr testing machines in the UK, just that there is no data for drug resistant nematodes in canines.
The UK govt handling of the infected blood scandal is another example of poor management. Rather than use a US test, they did nothing until a UK test was developed, allowing people to die from crack pot theories dreamt up by doctors.
So if you cant detect a pathogen, cancer or senescent cell in the body, how can it be treated?
Thats seems to be the crux of science.
I'm surprised they don't inject mercury into cancer tumours because mercury induces mitochondrial dysfunction and cancer cells do have mitochondria. But I dont want to sound too Trump-ist, even though its used in dental fillings and is particularly useful at killing syphilis.
And when looking at cancer leeching nutrients from surrounding tissue, how is that any different to bacteria? They also need nutrients which they take from the body and they can still kill people, as can the benzene ring, a known carcinogen, found in antibiotics, suggesting heavy antibiotic use can cause or contribute to cancer and yet are also used in medicine.
I find the history of cancer treatment in the US interesting, nicotinic acid aka sunburn effect vitamin B3 was the first chemo drug, dont know what the thinking was for using it, maybe it was the dna rebinding effect it has, or maybe the prostaglandin stimulation that was thought to be useful.
But in the absence of explanations, I'm not inspired by the medical profession.
https://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/folate-and-formaldehyde-from-...