Whenever I push for things that are technically correct I'm ignored and/or not treated well it seems.
Whenever I push for things that are technically correct I'm ignored and/or not treated well it seems.
Same people will also claim "we don't need a frontend dev or a UX designer".
Now ofc I wouldn't give any executives that idea. Don't mess with expected user functionality, that's like UX 101. if I see my navigation tampered with, I flag that site as spam.
Happy to report that our production site has more links that look like buttons than it does buttons that act like links. It’s almost a meme on my team that Swiz will get you if you use onClick for navigation.
The other hill I enjoy defending is that we should use more browser built-in components instead of trying to design our own.
I jest, but I am at least 5 years older than everyone else on the team. And have the unfun background of getting into professional webdev before jQuery.
Ugh. Let me know if you have any tips. All the art-school “UX designers” have to have custom date pickers and stupid knockoffs of iOS switches and custom drop-downs when there are actual, better, and automatically-accessible, versions of all those. How do you fight against this vanity design without making an enemy of the whole design team?
Yet there seems to be a free pass where a "web designer" is allowed to dictate how a site should work and look without knowing the basics of HTML, CSS and JS.